A pencil of Enriques surfaces of index one with no section (Q1047625): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Importer (talk | contribs)
Changed an Item
Import241208061232 (talk | contribs)
Normalize DOI.
 
Property / DOI
 
Property / DOI: 10.2140/ant.2009.3.637 / rank
Normal rank
 
Property / DOI
 
Property / DOI: 10.2140/ANT.2009.3.637 / rank
 
Normal rank

Latest revision as of 14:52, 10 December 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
A pencil of Enriques surfaces of index one with no section
scientific article

    Statements

    A pencil of Enriques surfaces of index one with no section (English)
    0 references
    5 January 2010
    0 references
    Monodromy and deformation-and-specialization techniques are used to answer some questions related to \textit{T. Graber, J. Harris, B. Mazur} and \textit{J. Starr} [Ann. Sci. Éc. Norm. Supér. (4) 38, No. 5, 671--692 (2005; Zbl 1092.14062)]. The main result is a new proof of the existence of a pencil of Enriques surfaces without sections over certain algebraically closed field (in particular over the complex numbers). Moreover, it is proved that these surfaces have index 1. This last fact (and more generally the existence of separated closed points of degree 3 and 4 on the generic fibre of the pencil) is significant in view of the search of cohomological obstructions to the existence of a section, a problem posed by Hélène Esnault. With the same techniques the author can produce families of hypersurfaces which are used to complete the argument from [loc. cit.]. In the language of [loc. cit.], this result implies that given a normal, projective variety of dimension \(\geq 2\) there does not exist a family of curves in \(B\) which is, simultaneously for all integers \(n\), a witness family for relative dimension \(n\).
    0 references
    rational points
    0 references
    Enriques surfaces
    0 references

    Identifiers