Explicit bounds for residues of Dedekind zeta functions, values of \(L\)-functions at \(s=1\), and relative class numbers (Q5928009): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
ReferenceBot (talk | contribs)
Changed an Item
Import241208061232 (talk | contribs)
Normalize DOI.
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Property / DOI
 
Property / DOI: 10.1006/jnth.2000.2545 / rank
Normal rank
 
Property / DOI
 
Property / DOI: 10.1006/JNTH.2000.2545 / rank
 
Normal rank

Latest revision as of 11:38, 9 December 2024

scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1579181
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Explicit bounds for residues of Dedekind zeta functions, values of \(L\)-functions at \(s=1\), and relative class numbers
scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1579181

    Statements

    Explicit bounds for residues of Dedekind zeta functions, values of \(L\)-functions at \(s=1\), and relative class numbers (English)
    0 references
    19 March 2001
    0 references
    Let \(L\) be an algebraic number field of degree \(n >1\) and with discriminant \(d_L\), and let \(\zeta(s)\) denote the Dedekind zeta function of \(L\). In [J. Math. Soc. Japan 50, 57-69 (1998; Zbl 1040.11081)], the author proved that the residue at \(s = 1\) of \(\zeta\) is \(\leq (e \log d_L / 2(n-1))^{n-1}\) if \(L\) is totally real; in this paper, he proves this result for general number fields, thereby improving previously known bounds in many cases. His second theorem is that \[ |L(1,\chi)|\leq 2 (e \log (d_L f_\chi)/2n)^n, \] where \(\chi\) is a nontrivial primitive ray class character of conductor \(f_\chi\). The following lemma is responsible for the simplicity of the proofs of these theorems: Let \(\zeta\) denote Riemann's zeta function, and put \(\Lambda(s) = s(s-1) \pi^{-s/2} \Gamma(s/2) \zeta(s)\) and \(G(s) = \sqrt{\pi} \Gamma((s+1)/2)/s\Gamma(s/2)\). Then \(\Lambda\) and \(G\) are positive, and \(\log \Lambda\) and \(\log G\) are convex on \((0, \infty)\). As an application of these estimates, class number bounds for relative class numbers of CM fields are obtained; in particular, the author strengthens a result of \textit{H. M. Stark} [Invent. Math. 23, 135-152 (1974; Zbl 0278.12005)] on lower bounds of the relative class number of CM fields not having quadratic subfields.
    0 references
    Dedekind zeta function
    0 references
    \(L\)-functions
    0 references
    class number bounds
    0 references
    CM fields
    0 references

    Identifiers

    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references