Explicit bounds for residues of Dedekind zeta functions, values of \(L\)-functions at \(s=1\), and relative class numbers (Q5928009): Difference between revisions
From MaRDI portal
ReferenceBot (talk | contribs) Changed an Item |
Normalize DOI. |
||
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
Property / DOI | |||
Property / DOI: 10.1006/jnth.2000.2545 / rank | |||
Property / DOI | |||
Property / DOI: 10.1006/JNTH.2000.2545 / rank | |||
Normal rank |
Latest revision as of 11:38, 9 December 2024
scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1579181
Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
---|---|---|---|
English | Explicit bounds for residues of Dedekind zeta functions, values of \(L\)-functions at \(s=1\), and relative class numbers |
scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1579181 |
Statements
Explicit bounds for residues of Dedekind zeta functions, values of \(L\)-functions at \(s=1\), and relative class numbers (English)
0 references
19 March 2001
0 references
Let \(L\) be an algebraic number field of degree \(n >1\) and with discriminant \(d_L\), and let \(\zeta(s)\) denote the Dedekind zeta function of \(L\). In [J. Math. Soc. Japan 50, 57-69 (1998; Zbl 1040.11081)], the author proved that the residue at \(s = 1\) of \(\zeta\) is \(\leq (e \log d_L / 2(n-1))^{n-1}\) if \(L\) is totally real; in this paper, he proves this result for general number fields, thereby improving previously known bounds in many cases. His second theorem is that \[ |L(1,\chi)|\leq 2 (e \log (d_L f_\chi)/2n)^n, \] where \(\chi\) is a nontrivial primitive ray class character of conductor \(f_\chi\). The following lemma is responsible for the simplicity of the proofs of these theorems: Let \(\zeta\) denote Riemann's zeta function, and put \(\Lambda(s) = s(s-1) \pi^{-s/2} \Gamma(s/2) \zeta(s)\) and \(G(s) = \sqrt{\pi} \Gamma((s+1)/2)/s\Gamma(s/2)\). Then \(\Lambda\) and \(G\) are positive, and \(\log \Lambda\) and \(\log G\) are convex on \((0, \infty)\). As an application of these estimates, class number bounds for relative class numbers of CM fields are obtained; in particular, the author strengthens a result of \textit{H. M. Stark} [Invent. Math. 23, 135-152 (1974; Zbl 0278.12005)] on lower bounds of the relative class number of CM fields not having quadratic subfields.
0 references
Dedekind zeta function
0 references
\(L\)-functions
0 references
class number bounds
0 references
CM fields
0 references
0 references