Existence of invariant tori for certain weakly reversible mappings (Q1565987): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
ReferenceBot (talk | contribs)
Changed an Item
Import241208061232 (talk | contribs)
Normalize DOI.
 
Property / DOI
 
Property / DOI: 10.1007/s10114-002-0180-z / rank
Normal rank
 
Property / DOI
 
Property / DOI: 10.1007/S10114-002-0180-Z / rank
 
Normal rank

Latest revision as of 21:34, 10 December 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Existence of invariant tori for certain weakly reversible mappings
scientific article

    Statements

    Existence of invariant tori for certain weakly reversible mappings (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    9 February 2004
    0 references
    The author considers the mapping \({\mathcal M}\) close to an integrable one \(x_1=x+h(y)+f(x,y)\), \(y_1=y+g(x,y)\) and close to an involution \(x_1=-x+p(x,y)\), \(y_1=y+q(x,y)\) where \((x,y)\in T^m\times O(\Omega)\), \(\Omega\in \mathbb{R}^n\) is the closure of a connected bounded open domain and \(O(\Omega)\) is some neighborhood of \(\Omega,f(x,y),g(x,y)\) and \(p(x,y),q(x,y)\) are perturbations. The mapping \({\mathcal M}\) is weakly reversible with respect to the mapping \({\mathcal G}\), i.e. \({\mathcal M}{\mathcal G}{\mathcal M}={\mathcal G}\). Under some weak non-degeneracy condition a uniform KAM iteration is constructed for the proof of the existence of a Cantor family of \(m\)-tori invariant under the reversible mapping \({\mathcal M}\) and the reversing mapping \({\mathcal G}\).
    0 references
    weakly reversible mappings
    0 references
    weak non-degeneracy condition
    0 references
    invariant tori
    0 references

    Identifiers