PID pairs of rings and maximal non-PID subrings (Q636761): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
ReferenceBot (talk | contribs)
Changed an Item
Import241208061232 (talk | contribs)
Normalize DOI.
 
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Property / DOI
 
Property / DOI: 10.1007/s00209-010-0687-4 / rank
Normal rank
 
Property / DOI
 
Property / DOI: 10.1007/S00209-010-0687-4 / rank
 
Normal rank

Latest revision as of 23:16, 9 December 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
PID pairs of rings and maximal non-PID subrings
scientific article

    Statements

    PID pairs of rings and maximal non-PID subrings (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    30 August 2011
    0 references
    Let \(R\subset S\) be a domain extension. \((R,S)\) is a principal ideal domain (shortly PID) pair if every ring \(T\), \(R\subset T\subset S\) is a PID. If \(R\) is not a field then it shows that the only PID pairs are those such that \(R\) is a PID. If \(R\) is a field then \((R,S)\) is a PID pair iff \(S\) is algebraic over \(R\). If \(R\) and \(S\) share a nonzero ideal, then \(R\) is a maximal non-PID subring of \(S\) iff \(S\) is a PID, \(R\) is not a PID and \(R\subset S\) is a minimal extension, that is it has no intermediate rings. Suppose that \(R\) is a Dedekind domain with infinitely many maximal ideals. Then \(R\) is a maximal non-PID subring of \(S\) iff \(R\) has a cyclic divisor class group generated by the class of any maximal ideal of \(R\).
    0 references
    principal ideal domain, Dedekind domain, Prüfer domain
    0 references

    Identifiers

    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references