Conservativity for logics of justified belief: two approaches (Q408535): Difference between revisions
From MaRDI portal
ReferenceBot (talk | contribs) Changed an Item |
Normalize DOI. |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Property / DOI | |||
| Property / DOI: 10.1016/j.apal.2011.09.015 / rank | |||
| Property / DOI | |||
| Property / DOI: 10.1016/J.APAL.2011.09.015 / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Latest revision as of 16:42, 9 December 2024
scientific article
| Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
|---|---|---|---|
| English | Conservativity for logics of justified belief: two approaches |
scientific article |
Statements
Conservativity for logics of justified belief: two approaches (English)
0 references
10 April 2012
0 references
The author mainly focuses on two logics of justified belief to which he refers as J and J4. The logical syntax of J4 includes the operation of positive introspection while that of J does not. The author shows, syntactically and semantically, that for every proof in J4 of a wff in which there is no occurrence of the operator in question, there is a corresponding proof in J. In addition, there are some remarks in the paper on whether similar results can or cannot be obtained for other logics of justified belief.
0 references
justification logics
0 references
epistemic logic
0 references
doxastic logic
0 references
sequent calculus
0 references
semantics for logic of belief
0 references
