Matching cells (Q6058326): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Added link to MaRDI item.
ReferenceBot (talk | contribs)
Changed an Item
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Property / OpenAlex ID
 
Property / OpenAlex ID: W4388200056 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Extending Triangulations / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Round handles and non-singular Morse-Smale flows / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Theoretical Improvements in Algorithmic Efficiency for Network Flow Problems / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Maximal Flow Through a Network / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Combinatorial vector fields and dynamical systems / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Morse theory for cell complexes / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q5702573 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q5432045 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Combinatorial realization of the Thom-Smale complex via discrete Morse theory / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: The theory of foliations of codimension greater than one / rank
 
Normal rank

Latest revision as of 09:50, 3 August 2024

scientific article; zbMATH DE number 7758508
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Matching cells
scientific article; zbMATH DE number 7758508

    Statements

    Matching cells (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    1 November 2023
    0 references
    Consider \(X\) a polyhedral cellular complex and \(Y\subseteq X\) a subcomplex. A matching on \(X\) relative to \(Y\) or a \textbf{matching on the pair \((X,Y)\)} is a partition on the set of cells \(X \) which are not in \(Y\) into incident pairs. The pair \((X,Y)\) is said to be matchable if there exists a matching on the pair \((X,Y)\). If \(Y=\emptyset\) then \(X\) is said to be matchable. All manifolds and triangulations in this paper are considered to be smooth. The following lemma is used throughout the paper and plays an important role in the proofs of the main results. \textbf{Lemma:} If \(H_{\ast}(X,Y)=0\) then \((X,Y)\) is matchable. The first main result of the paper is the following, and its proof is by induction over \(n\). \textbf{Theorem:} Let \(M\) be a rational homology sphere of odd dimension. Then any triangulation and every polyhedral cellulation of \(M\) is matchable. \textbf{Corollary:} Let \(M\) be a closed connected \(3\)-manifold whose first Betti number is \(1\). Then every polyhedral cellulation of \(M\) is matchable. The second main theorem is the following. \textbf{Theorem:} Let \(M\) be a compact connected manifold with smooth boundary, and let \(\partial_0 M\) be a union of connected components of \(\partial M\) such that the relative Euler characteristic \(\chi (M,\partial_0M) = \chi(M) - \chi(\partial_0M)\) is zero. Then every triangulation of \(M\) is matchable relative to \(\partial_0M\). The author gives two proofs of this last theorem; one of the two proofs is constructive, uses round handle decompositions, and works in any dimension different from three. The other proof uses the following theorem, which is also proven in this paper: \textbf{Theorem:} Let \(M\) be a compact \(n\)-dimensional manifold with smooth boundary. If a non singular vector field \(\triangledown\) is transverse to every \(n-1\)-simplex of \(X\), then \(\partial M\) splits as the disjoint union of \( \partial_s (M \triangledown)\) and \( \partial_u (M \triangledown)\) where \(\triangledown\) enters and exits \(M\), respectively and the pair \((X, \partial_u (M \triangledown))\) is matchable. \textbf{Corollary:} Every closed connected manifold whose Euler characteristic vanishes admits a matchable triangulation. The author gives several examples of both matchable complexes as well as non matchable complexes whose Euler characteristc vanishes. Finally, the author finishes with the open question: Let \(n\) be an odd integer, is every triangulation of every closed \(n\)-manifold matchable?
    0 references
    matching
    0 references
    triangulation
    0 references
    discrete vector field
    0 references

    Identifiers

    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references