Multiple linear regressions by maximizing the likelihood under assumption of generalized Gauss-Laplace distribution of the error (Q2013958): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
ReferenceBot (talk | contribs)
Changed an Item
Created claim: DBLP publication ID (P1635): journals/cmmm/JantschiBB16, #quickstatements; #temporary_batch_1732532539753
 
Property / DBLP publication ID
 
Property / DBLP publication ID: journals/cmmm/JantschiBB16 / rank
 
Normal rank

Latest revision as of 12:03, 25 November 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Multiple linear regressions by maximizing the likelihood under assumption of generalized Gauss-Laplace distribution of the error
scientific article

    Statements

    Multiple linear regressions by maximizing the likelihood under assumption of generalized Gauss-Laplace distribution of the error (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    10 August 2017
    0 references
    Summary: Multiple linear regression analysis is widely used to link an outcome with predictors for better understanding of the behaviour of the outcome of interest. Usually, under the assumption that the errors follow a normal distribution, the coefficients of the model are estimated by minimizing the sum of squared deviations. A new approach based on maximum likelihood estimation is proposed for finding the coefficients on linear models with two predictors without any constrictive assumptions on the distribution of the errors. The algorithm was developed, implemented, and tested as proof-of-concept using fourteen sets of compounds by investigating the link between activity/property (as outcome) and structural feature information incorporated by molecular descriptors (as predictors). The results on real data demonstrated that in all investigated cases the power of the error is significantly different by the convenient value of two when the Gauss-Laplace distribution was used to relax the constrictive assumption of the normal distribution of the error. Therefore, the Gauss-Laplace distribution of the error could not be rejected while the hypothesis that the power of the error from Gauss-Laplace distribution is normal distributed also failed to be rejected.
    0 references
    multiple linear regression
    0 references
    Gauss-Laplace distribution
    0 references

    Identifiers