Multiangle social network recommendation algorithms and similarity network evaluation (Q364292): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Importer (talk | contribs)
Created a new Item
 
Created claim: DBLP publication ID (P1635): journals/jam/HuGP13, #quickstatements; #temporary_batch_1731475607626
 
(6 intermediate revisions by 6 users not shown)
Property / review text
 
Summary: Multiangle social network recommendation algorithms (MSN) and a new assessment method, called similarity network evaluation (SNE), are both proposed. From the viewpoint of six dimensions, the MSN are classified into six algorithms, including user-based algorithm from resource point (UBR), user-based algorithm from tag point (UBT), resource-based algorithm from tag point (RBT), resource-based algorithm from user point (RBU), tag-based algorithm from resource point (TBR), and tag-based algorithm from user point (TBU). Compared with the traditional recall/precision (RP) method, the SNE is more simple, effective, and visualized. The simulation results show that TBR and UBR are the best algorithms, RBU and TBU are the worst ones, and UBT and RBT are in the medium levels.
Property / review text: Summary: Multiangle social network recommendation algorithms (MSN) and a new assessment method, called similarity network evaluation (SNE), are both proposed. From the viewpoint of six dimensions, the MSN are classified into six algorithms, including user-based algorithm from resource point (UBR), user-based algorithm from tag point (UBT), resource-based algorithm from tag point (RBT), resource-based algorithm from user point (RBU), tag-based algorithm from resource point (TBR), and tag-based algorithm from user point (TBU). Compared with the traditional recall/precision (RP) method, the SNE is more simple, effective, and visualized. The simulation results show that TBR and UBR are the best algorithms, RBU and TBU are the worst ones, and UBT and RBT are in the medium levels. / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Mathematics Subject Classification ID
 
Property / Mathematics Subject Classification ID: 91D30 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Mathematics Subject Classification ID
 
Property / Mathematics Subject Classification ID: 90B10 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / zbMATH DE Number
 
Property / zbMATH DE Number: 6206767 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Wikidata QID
 
Property / Wikidata QID: Q59002341 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / describes a project that uses
 
Property / describes a project that uses: Pajek / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / MaRDI profile type
 
Property / MaRDI profile type: MaRDI publication profile / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / full work available at URL
 
Property / full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/248084 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / OpenAlex ID
 
Property / OpenAlex ID: W1986159573 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / DBLP publication ID
 
Property / DBLP publication ID: journals/jam/HuGP13 / rank
 
Normal rank
links / mardi / namelinks / mardi / name
 

Latest revision as of 06:29, 13 November 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Multiangle social network recommendation algorithms and similarity network evaluation
scientific article

    Statements

    Multiangle social network recommendation algorithms and similarity network evaluation (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    9 September 2013
    0 references
    Summary: Multiangle social network recommendation algorithms (MSN) and a new assessment method, called similarity network evaluation (SNE), are both proposed. From the viewpoint of six dimensions, the MSN are classified into six algorithms, including user-based algorithm from resource point (UBR), user-based algorithm from tag point (UBT), resource-based algorithm from tag point (RBT), resource-based algorithm from user point (RBU), tag-based algorithm from resource point (TBR), and tag-based algorithm from user point (TBU). Compared with the traditional recall/precision (RP) method, the SNE is more simple, effective, and visualized. The simulation results show that TBR and UBR are the best algorithms, RBU and TBU are the worst ones, and UBT and RBT are in the medium levels.
    0 references

    Identifiers