Multiangle social network recommendation algorithms and similarity network evaluation (Q364292): Difference between revisions
From MaRDI portal
Created a new Item |
Created claim: DBLP publication ID (P1635): journals/jam/HuGP13, #quickstatements; #temporary_batch_1731475607626 |
||
(6 intermediate revisions by 6 users not shown) | |||
Property / review text | |||
Summary: Multiangle social network recommendation algorithms (MSN) and a new assessment method, called similarity network evaluation (SNE), are both proposed. From the viewpoint of six dimensions, the MSN are classified into six algorithms, including user-based algorithm from resource point (UBR), user-based algorithm from tag point (UBT), resource-based algorithm from tag point (RBT), resource-based algorithm from user point (RBU), tag-based algorithm from resource point (TBR), and tag-based algorithm from user point (TBU). Compared with the traditional recall/precision (RP) method, the SNE is more simple, effective, and visualized. The simulation results show that TBR and UBR are the best algorithms, RBU and TBU are the worst ones, and UBT and RBT are in the medium levels. | |||
Property / review text: Summary: Multiangle social network recommendation algorithms (MSN) and a new assessment method, called similarity network evaluation (SNE), are both proposed. From the viewpoint of six dimensions, the MSN are classified into six algorithms, including user-based algorithm from resource point (UBR), user-based algorithm from tag point (UBT), resource-based algorithm from tag point (RBT), resource-based algorithm from user point (RBU), tag-based algorithm from resource point (TBR), and tag-based algorithm from user point (TBU). Compared with the traditional recall/precision (RP) method, the SNE is more simple, effective, and visualized. The simulation results show that TBR and UBR are the best algorithms, RBU and TBU are the worst ones, and UBT and RBT are in the medium levels. / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / Mathematics Subject Classification ID | |||
Property / Mathematics Subject Classification ID: 91D30 / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / Mathematics Subject Classification ID | |||
Property / Mathematics Subject Classification ID: 90B10 / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / zbMATH DE Number | |||
Property / zbMATH DE Number: 6206767 / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / Wikidata QID | |||
Property / Wikidata QID: Q59002341 / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / describes a project that uses | |||
Property / describes a project that uses: Pajek / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / MaRDI profile type | |||
Property / MaRDI profile type: MaRDI publication profile / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / full work available at URL | |||
Property / full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/248084 / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / OpenAlex ID | |||
Property / OpenAlex ID: W1986159573 / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / DBLP publication ID | |||
Property / DBLP publication ID: journals/jam/HuGP13 / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
links / mardi / name | links / mardi / name | ||
Latest revision as of 06:29, 13 November 2024
scientific article
Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
---|---|---|---|
English | Multiangle social network recommendation algorithms and similarity network evaluation |
scientific article |
Statements
Multiangle social network recommendation algorithms and similarity network evaluation (English)
0 references
9 September 2013
0 references
Summary: Multiangle social network recommendation algorithms (MSN) and a new assessment method, called similarity network evaluation (SNE), are both proposed. From the viewpoint of six dimensions, the MSN are classified into six algorithms, including user-based algorithm from resource point (UBR), user-based algorithm from tag point (UBT), resource-based algorithm from tag point (RBT), resource-based algorithm from user point (RBU), tag-based algorithm from resource point (TBR), and tag-based algorithm from user point (TBU). Compared with the traditional recall/precision (RP) method, the SNE is more simple, effective, and visualized. The simulation results show that TBR and UBR are the best algorithms, RBU and TBU are the worst ones, and UBT and RBT are in the medium levels.
0 references