Approximating the number of double cut-and-join scenarios (Q441869): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Importer (talk | contribs)
Created a new Item
 
ReferenceBot (talk | contribs)
Changed an Item
 
(4 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown)
Property / review text
 
In the present paper, the authors study the problem of counting the number of DCJ scenarios between two genomes represented as sets of paths and cycles. The problem is of importance: if determining the DCJ distance is easy (there exists a closed formula), knowing the number of scenarios that satisfy this distance, and, more importantly, being able to provide a sample of the most likely ones, is a problem that needs to be studied in more depth. The authors show the following results: 1) counting the number of optimal DCJ scenarios admits a fully polynomial time randomized approximation scheme (FPRAS); 2) there exists an MCMC uniform sampler that approximates this number; 3) this MCMC converges to the uniform distribution in fully polynomial time. In particular, the latter two results can be used to generate a sample of DCJ scenarios from a given distribution, in order to test some hypotheses on genome evolution. Due to the subjects covered by the authors in this paper, one needs to be familiar with genome rearrangements (and especially DCJ), complexity classes, and probabilities. However, the paper is cautiously written and is pleasant for the informed reader.
Property / review text: In the present paper, the authors study the problem of counting the number of DCJ scenarios between two genomes represented as sets of paths and cycles. The problem is of importance: if determining the DCJ distance is easy (there exists a closed formula), knowing the number of scenarios that satisfy this distance, and, more importantly, being able to provide a sample of the most likely ones, is a problem that needs to be studied in more depth. The authors show the following results: 1) counting the number of optimal DCJ scenarios admits a fully polynomial time randomized approximation scheme (FPRAS); 2) there exists an MCMC uniform sampler that approximates this number; 3) this MCMC converges to the uniform distribution in fully polynomial time. In particular, the latter two results can be used to generate a sample of DCJ scenarios from a given distribution, in order to test some hypotheses on genome evolution. Due to the subjects covered by the authors in this paper, one needs to be familiar with genome rearrangements (and especially DCJ), complexity classes, and probabilities. However, the paper is cautiously written and is pleasant for the informed reader. / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / reviewed by
 
Property / reviewed by: Guillaume Fertin / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Mathematics Subject Classification ID
 
Property / Mathematics Subject Classification ID: 68Q17 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Mathematics Subject Classification ID
 
Property / Mathematics Subject Classification ID: 92D10 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Mathematics Subject Classification ID
 
Property / Mathematics Subject Classification ID: 05C90 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Mathematics Subject Classification ID
 
Property / Mathematics Subject Classification ID: 60J10 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / zbMATH DE Number
 
Property / zbMATH DE Number: 6064150 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / zbMATH Keywords
 
comparative genomics
Property / zbMATH Keywords: comparative genomics / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / zbMATH Keywords
 
genome rearrangement
Property / zbMATH Keywords: genome rearrangement / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / zbMATH Keywords
 
FPRAS
Property / zbMATH Keywords: FPRAS / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / zbMATH Keywords
 
DCJ
Property / zbMATH Keywords: DCJ / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / zbMATH Keywords
 
MCMC
Property / zbMATH Keywords: MCMC / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / MaRDI profile type
 
Property / MaRDI profile type: MaRDI publication profile / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / full work available at URL
 
Property / full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tcs.2012.03.006 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / OpenAlex ID
 
Property / OpenAlex ID: W2146844850 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q4410146 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Finding all sorting tandem duplication random loss operations / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Geometric bounds for eigenvalues of Markov chains / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q3393448 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Random generation of combinatorial structures from a uniform distribution / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Bayesian Phylogenetic Inference from Animal Mitochondrial Genome Arrangements / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Equation of State Calculations by Fast Computing Machines / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Improved Bounds for Mixing Rates of Markov Chains and Multicommodity Flow / rank
 
Normal rank
links / mardi / namelinks / mardi / name
 

Latest revision as of 13:34, 5 July 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Approximating the number of double cut-and-join scenarios
scientific article

    Statements

    Approximating the number of double cut-and-join scenarios (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    8 August 2012
    0 references
    In the present paper, the authors study the problem of counting the number of DCJ scenarios between two genomes represented as sets of paths and cycles. The problem is of importance: if determining the DCJ distance is easy (there exists a closed formula), knowing the number of scenarios that satisfy this distance, and, more importantly, being able to provide a sample of the most likely ones, is a problem that needs to be studied in more depth. The authors show the following results: 1) counting the number of optimal DCJ scenarios admits a fully polynomial time randomized approximation scheme (FPRAS); 2) there exists an MCMC uniform sampler that approximates this number; 3) this MCMC converges to the uniform distribution in fully polynomial time. In particular, the latter two results can be used to generate a sample of DCJ scenarios from a given distribution, in order to test some hypotheses on genome evolution. Due to the subjects covered by the authors in this paper, one needs to be familiar with genome rearrangements (and especially DCJ), complexity classes, and probabilities. However, the paper is cautiously written and is pleasant for the informed reader.
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    comparative genomics
    0 references
    genome rearrangement
    0 references
    FPRAS
    0 references
    DCJ
    0 references
    MCMC
    0 references
    0 references