Updating toward the signal (Q447541): Difference between revisions
From MaRDI portal
Created a new Item |
Normalize DOI. |
||
(6 intermediate revisions by 6 users not shown) | |||
Property / DOI | |||
Property / DOI: 10.1007/s00199-010-0588-0 / rank | |||
Property / review text | |||
In economic theory, it is frequently assumed that agents infer the value of some random variable based on imperfect observation. For example, bidders in auctions infer the unknown value of an object from private signals (cf. [\textit{R. Wilson}, Rev. Econ. Stud. 44, 511--518 (1977; Zbl 0373.90012)]). Modelers often assume that the posterior expectation lies between the prior expectation and the observed signal for every possible signal value. We will call this property updating toward the signal (UTS). This property was verified in some cases such as under normal prior with a normally distributed and independent signal error. However, UTS is not verified in general, although many authors take this property as necessary for the results they present (cf. [\textit{D. A. Moore} and \textit{P. J. Healy}, Psychol. Rev. 115, 502--517 (2008)]). The authors also study a weaker updating requirement, where the posterior mean must lie in the same direction as the signal, relative to the prior mean. They refer to this property as UDS. Finally, mean reinforcement (MR) is also considered. It requires that the posterior mean equal the prior mean when the signal equals the prior mean. They show that if the prior and signal error densities are both symmetric and quasiconcave then UTS will occur. Moreover, if for a given prior, UTS occurs for all symmetric and quasiconcave error densities, then the prior must be symmetric and quasiconcave. Similar characterizations are derived for UDS and MR. Examples are used to verify that the results are tight. In the economics literature, this paper is similar in spirit to [\textit{P. R. Milgrom}, Bell J. Econ. 12, 380--391 (1981)], though the current article seeks to order the posterior mean relative to the prior mean while Milgrom's goal is to order various posterior distributions according to their signal realizations. Demonstrations of some results make use of changes of variables and Bayes's rule. They finally show their main results by applying them to the so-called portfolio allocation problem (cf. [\textit{K. J. Arrow}, Essays in the theory of risk-bearing. Amsterdam-London: North-Holland Publishing Company (1970; Zbl 0215.58602), Chapter 3], and [\textit{H. M. Markowitz}, J. Financ. 7, 77--91 (1952)], among others). To do this, they consider a risk-averse investor allocating a fixed endowment of wealth between a risky asset and a risk-free asset. Initially, he makes a portfolio allocation decision based only on his prior beliefs about the risky asset's return. Then, he receives an informative signal and is asked if he would like to revise his investment decision. They define three different notions of how the investor's signal might reinforce his prior investment decision that are equivalent to MR, UDS, and UTS, respectively. Applying two of the main results of the paper gives two characterizations in the context of the portfolio allocation problem. Its meaning is that a modeler who assumes that good signals always reinforce a decision to invest (for all uniform error distributions) and bad signals always reinforce a decision not to invest, implicitly assumes symmetry and perhaps quasiconcavity of the prior distribution. | |||
Property / review text: In economic theory, it is frequently assumed that agents infer the value of some random variable based on imperfect observation. For example, bidders in auctions infer the unknown value of an object from private signals (cf. [\textit{R. Wilson}, Rev. Econ. Stud. 44, 511--518 (1977; Zbl 0373.90012)]). Modelers often assume that the posterior expectation lies between the prior expectation and the observed signal for every possible signal value. We will call this property updating toward the signal (UTS). This property was verified in some cases such as under normal prior with a normally distributed and independent signal error. However, UTS is not verified in general, although many authors take this property as necessary for the results they present (cf. [\textit{D. A. Moore} and \textit{P. J. Healy}, Psychol. Rev. 115, 502--517 (2008)]). The authors also study a weaker updating requirement, where the posterior mean must lie in the same direction as the signal, relative to the prior mean. They refer to this property as UDS. Finally, mean reinforcement (MR) is also considered. It requires that the posterior mean equal the prior mean when the signal equals the prior mean. They show that if the prior and signal error densities are both symmetric and quasiconcave then UTS will occur. Moreover, if for a given prior, UTS occurs for all symmetric and quasiconcave error densities, then the prior must be symmetric and quasiconcave. Similar characterizations are derived for UDS and MR. Examples are used to verify that the results are tight. In the economics literature, this paper is similar in spirit to [\textit{P. R. Milgrom}, Bell J. Econ. 12, 380--391 (1981)], though the current article seeks to order the posterior mean relative to the prior mean while Milgrom's goal is to order various posterior distributions according to their signal realizations. Demonstrations of some results make use of changes of variables and Bayes's rule. They finally show their main results by applying them to the so-called portfolio allocation problem (cf. [\textit{K. J. Arrow}, Essays in the theory of risk-bearing. Amsterdam-London: North-Holland Publishing Company (1970; Zbl 0215.58602), Chapter 3], and [\textit{H. M. Markowitz}, J. Financ. 7, 77--91 (1952)], among others). To do this, they consider a risk-averse investor allocating a fixed endowment of wealth between a risky asset and a risk-free asset. Initially, he makes a portfolio allocation decision based only on his prior beliefs about the risky asset's return. Then, he receives an informative signal and is asked if he would like to revise his investment decision. They define three different notions of how the investor's signal might reinforce his prior investment decision that are equivalent to MR, UDS, and UTS, respectively. Applying two of the main results of the paper gives two characterizations in the context of the portfolio allocation problem. Its meaning is that a modeler who assumes that good signals always reinforce a decision to invest (for all uniform error distributions) and bad signals always reinforce a decision not to invest, implicitly assumes symmetry and perhaps quasiconcavity of the prior distribution. / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / reviewed by | |||
Property / reviewed by: Balbina V. Casas Méndez / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / Mathematics Subject Classification ID | |||
Property / Mathematics Subject Classification ID: 91A28 / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / Mathematics Subject Classification ID | |||
Property / Mathematics Subject Classification ID: 62F15 / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / Mathematics Subject Classification ID | |||
Property / Mathematics Subject Classification ID: 94A12 / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / Mathematics Subject Classification ID | |||
Property / Mathematics Subject Classification ID: 91G10 / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / zbMATH DE Number | |||
Property / zbMATH DE Number: 6076612 / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / zbMATH Keywords | |||
signal extraction | |||
Property / zbMATH Keywords: signal extraction / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / zbMATH Keywords | |||
Bayes's rule | |||
Property / zbMATH Keywords: Bayes's rule / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / zbMATH Keywords | |||
reversion to the mean | |||
Property / zbMATH Keywords: reversion to the mean / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / zbMATH Keywords | |||
posterior beliefs | |||
Property / zbMATH Keywords: posterior beliefs / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / zbMATH Keywords | |||
Bayesian robustness signal extraction | |||
Property / zbMATH Keywords: Bayesian robustness signal extraction / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / zbMATH Keywords | |||
Bayesian robustness | |||
Property / zbMATH Keywords: Bayesian robustness / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / MaRDI profile type | |||
Property / MaRDI profile type: MaRDI publication profile / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / full work available at URL | |||
Property / full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00199-010-0588-0 / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / OpenAlex ID | |||
Property / OpenAlex ID: W1983584024 / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: Q3511639 / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: Shrinkage of the posterior mean In the normal case / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: Q5618987 / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: Market games in large economies with a finite number of types / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: An overview of robust Bayesian analysis. (With discussion) / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: Q5544781 / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: Conjugate priors for exponential families / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: On the generic nonconvergence of Bayesian actions and beliefs / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: Revisiting savage in a conditional world / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: Asymmetric information in a competitive market game: Reexamining the implications of rational expectations / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: Q4087117 / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: Learning, diversification and the nature of risk / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: A Theory of Auctions and Competitive Bidding / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: A representation of the posterior mean for a location model / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: Risk Aversion in the Small and in the Large / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: Looking smart versus playing dumb in common-value auctions / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: Efficient markets and Bayes' rule / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: Exchange of Cost Information in Oligopoly / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: Firm reputation with hidden information / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: A Bidding Model of Perfect Competition / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: A Tale of Two Time Scales / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / DOI | |||
Property / DOI: 10.1007/S00199-010-0588-0 / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
links / mardi / name | links / mardi / name | ||
Latest revision as of 17:53, 9 December 2024
scientific article
Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
---|---|---|---|
English | Updating toward the signal |
scientific article |
Statements
Updating toward the signal (English)
0 references
4 September 2012
0 references
In economic theory, it is frequently assumed that agents infer the value of some random variable based on imperfect observation. For example, bidders in auctions infer the unknown value of an object from private signals (cf. [\textit{R. Wilson}, Rev. Econ. Stud. 44, 511--518 (1977; Zbl 0373.90012)]). Modelers often assume that the posterior expectation lies between the prior expectation and the observed signal for every possible signal value. We will call this property updating toward the signal (UTS). This property was verified in some cases such as under normal prior with a normally distributed and independent signal error. However, UTS is not verified in general, although many authors take this property as necessary for the results they present (cf. [\textit{D. A. Moore} and \textit{P. J. Healy}, Psychol. Rev. 115, 502--517 (2008)]). The authors also study a weaker updating requirement, where the posterior mean must lie in the same direction as the signal, relative to the prior mean. They refer to this property as UDS. Finally, mean reinforcement (MR) is also considered. It requires that the posterior mean equal the prior mean when the signal equals the prior mean. They show that if the prior and signal error densities are both symmetric and quasiconcave then UTS will occur. Moreover, if for a given prior, UTS occurs for all symmetric and quasiconcave error densities, then the prior must be symmetric and quasiconcave. Similar characterizations are derived for UDS and MR. Examples are used to verify that the results are tight. In the economics literature, this paper is similar in spirit to [\textit{P. R. Milgrom}, Bell J. Econ. 12, 380--391 (1981)], though the current article seeks to order the posterior mean relative to the prior mean while Milgrom's goal is to order various posterior distributions according to their signal realizations. Demonstrations of some results make use of changes of variables and Bayes's rule. They finally show their main results by applying them to the so-called portfolio allocation problem (cf. [\textit{K. J. Arrow}, Essays in the theory of risk-bearing. Amsterdam-London: North-Holland Publishing Company (1970; Zbl 0215.58602), Chapter 3], and [\textit{H. M. Markowitz}, J. Financ. 7, 77--91 (1952)], among others). To do this, they consider a risk-averse investor allocating a fixed endowment of wealth between a risky asset and a risk-free asset. Initially, he makes a portfolio allocation decision based only on his prior beliefs about the risky asset's return. Then, he receives an informative signal and is asked if he would like to revise his investment decision. They define three different notions of how the investor's signal might reinforce his prior investment decision that are equivalent to MR, UDS, and UTS, respectively. Applying two of the main results of the paper gives two characterizations in the context of the portfolio allocation problem. Its meaning is that a modeler who assumes that good signals always reinforce a decision to invest (for all uniform error distributions) and bad signals always reinforce a decision not to invest, implicitly assumes symmetry and perhaps quasiconcavity of the prior distribution.
0 references
signal extraction
0 references
Bayes's rule
0 references
reversion to the mean
0 references
posterior beliefs
0 references
Bayesian robustness signal extraction
0 references
Bayesian robustness
0 references
0 references