Sample size calculation for controlling false discovery proportion (Q454792): Difference between revisions
From MaRDI portal
Created a new Item |
ReferenceBot (talk | contribs) Changed an Item |
||
(6 intermediate revisions by 6 users not shown) | |||
Property / author | |||
Property / author: Yongzhao Shao / rank | |||
Property / author | |||
Property / author: Yongzhao Shao / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / review text | |||
Summary: The false discovery proportion (FDP), the proportion of incorrect rejections among all rejections, is a direct measure of abundance of false positive findings in multiple testing. Many methods have been proposed to control FDP, but they are too conservative to be useful for power analysis. Study designs for controlling the mean of FDP, which is false discovery rate, have been commonly used. However, there has been little attempt to design study with direct FDP control to achieve certain level of efficiency. We provide a sample size calculation method using the variance formula of the FDP under weak-dependence assumptions to achieve the desired overall power. The relationship between design parameters and sample size is explored. The adequacy of the procedure is assessed by simulations. We illustrate the method using estimated correlations from a prostate cancer data set. | |||
Property / review text: Summary: The false discovery proportion (FDP), the proportion of incorrect rejections among all rejections, is a direct measure of abundance of false positive findings in multiple testing. Many methods have been proposed to control FDP, but they are too conservative to be useful for power analysis. Study designs for controlling the mean of FDP, which is false discovery rate, have been commonly used. However, there has been little attempt to design study with direct FDP control to achieve certain level of efficiency. We provide a sample size calculation method using the variance formula of the FDP under weak-dependence assumptions to achieve the desired overall power. The relationship between design parameters and sample size is explored. The adequacy of the procedure is assessed by simulations. We illustrate the method using estimated correlations from a prostate cancer data set. / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / Mathematics Subject Classification ID | |||
Property / Mathematics Subject Classification ID: 62J15 / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / Mathematics Subject Classification ID | |||
Property / Mathematics Subject Classification ID: 65C60 / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / Mathematics Subject Classification ID | |||
Property / Mathematics Subject Classification ID: 62P10 / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / zbMATH DE Number | |||
Property / zbMATH DE Number: 6092417 / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / Wikidata QID | |||
Property / Wikidata QID: Q58910990 / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / MaRDI profile type | |||
Property / MaRDI profile type: MaRDI publication profile / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / full work available at URL | |||
Property / full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/817948 / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / OpenAlex ID | |||
Property / OpenAlex ID: W2112530154 / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: Q4322338 / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: A Direct Approach to False Discovery Rates / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: Strong Control, Conservative Point Estimation and Simultaneous Conservative Consistency of False Discovery Rates: A Unified Approach / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: Generalized Augmentation to Control the False Discovery Exceedance in Multiple Testing / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: Exceedance Control of the False Discovery Proportion / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: A stochastic process approach to false discovery control. / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: Controlling the number of false discoveries: application to high-dimensional genomic data / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: False Discovery Control for Multiple Tests of Association Under General Dependence / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: Q5700453 / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: Sample size calculation for multiple testing in microarray data analysis / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: Comment / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: Some Results on the Control of the False Discovery Rate under Dependence / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
links / mardi / name | links / mardi / name | ||
Latest revision as of 17:42, 5 July 2024
scientific article
Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
---|---|---|---|
English | Sample size calculation for controlling false discovery proportion |
scientific article |
Statements
Sample size calculation for controlling false discovery proportion (English)
0 references
10 October 2012
0 references
Summary: The false discovery proportion (FDP), the proportion of incorrect rejections among all rejections, is a direct measure of abundance of false positive findings in multiple testing. Many methods have been proposed to control FDP, but they are too conservative to be useful for power analysis. Study designs for controlling the mean of FDP, which is false discovery rate, have been commonly used. However, there has been little attempt to design study with direct FDP control to achieve certain level of efficiency. We provide a sample size calculation method using the variance formula of the FDP under weak-dependence assumptions to achieve the desired overall power. The relationship between design parameters and sample size is explored. The adequacy of the procedure is assessed by simulations. We illustrate the method using estimated correlations from a prostate cancer data set.
0 references
0 references