Integral motives, relative Krull-Schmidt principle, and Maranda-type theorems (Q500246): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Importer (talk | contribs)
Created a new Item
 
Normalize DOI.
 
(7 intermediate revisions by 6 users not shown)
Property / DOI
 
Property / DOI: 10.1007/s00208-014-1158-8 / rank
Normal rank
 
Property / review text
 
This article is concerned with Chow motives with integral coefficients that are geometrically split. A Chow motive \(M\) over a field \(F\) is said to be geometrically split if there exists a field extension \(E/F\) such that the base change \(M_E\) is isomorphic to a direct sum of Tate motives. Examples of geometrically split motives are given by the motives of projective homogeneous varieties. A motive \(M\) is said to satisfy the Krull-Schmidt property if any two decompositions of \(M\) into a direct sum of indecomposable objects are equivalent (i.e., isomorphic up to reordering of the direct summands). This property had already been investigated for projective homogeneous varieties: for example, it holds for certain twisted flag varieties satisfying certain conditions [\textit{V. Chernousov} and \textit{A. Merkurjev}, Transform. Groups 11, No. 3, 371--386 (2006; Zbl 1111.14009)] and for projective quadrics [\textit{A. Vishik}, Lect. Notes Math. 1835, 25--101 (2004; Zbl 1047.11033)], but it fails in some cases [Chernousov and Merkurjev, loc. cit.], [\textit{B. Calmès} et al., Compos. Math. 142, No. 4, 1063--1080 (2006; Zbl 1111.14008)]. In this paper, the author ask a slightly different question: suppose that any two decompositions of \(M\) into a direct sum of indecomposable objects become equivalent after base-change to an algebraic closure of \(F\). Is it true that these two decompositions are equivalent? If this is the case, we say that \(M\) satisfies the relative Krull-Schmidt property. The previously known counterexamples to the Krull-Schmidt principle do not provide counterexamples to the relative Krull-Schmidt principle. The main result of this paper is Theorem 3.3. It is a general statement relating decompositions of \(M\) into direct sums of indecomposable objects after base-change and extension of ring of coefficients. Theorem 3.3 is used in Section 5 to show that the relative Krull-Schmidt principle holds for a wide class of projective homogeneous varieties, but fails for some twisted flag variety. The paper also includes results concerning motives with coefficients in a discrete valuation ring (Section 4), and results concerning decomposability of integral motives of generalized Severi-Brauer varieties (Section 5). For instance, it is shown that the classical Severi-Brauer varieties together with the examples previously studied by \textit{N. A. Karpenko} [St. Petersbg. Math. J. 7, No. 4, 649--661 (1996; Zbl 0866.14006); translation from Algebra Anal. 7, No. 4, 196--213 (1995)] are the only generalized Severi-Brauer varieties whose integral motive is indecomposable.
Property / review text: This article is concerned with Chow motives with integral coefficients that are geometrically split. A Chow motive \(M\) over a field \(F\) is said to be geometrically split if there exists a field extension \(E/F\) such that the base change \(M_E\) is isomorphic to a direct sum of Tate motives. Examples of geometrically split motives are given by the motives of projective homogeneous varieties. A motive \(M\) is said to satisfy the Krull-Schmidt property if any two decompositions of \(M\) into a direct sum of indecomposable objects are equivalent (i.e., isomorphic up to reordering of the direct summands). This property had already been investigated for projective homogeneous varieties: for example, it holds for certain twisted flag varieties satisfying certain conditions [\textit{V. Chernousov} and \textit{A. Merkurjev}, Transform. Groups 11, No. 3, 371--386 (2006; Zbl 1111.14009)] and for projective quadrics [\textit{A. Vishik}, Lect. Notes Math. 1835, 25--101 (2004; Zbl 1047.11033)], but it fails in some cases [Chernousov and Merkurjev, loc. cit.], [\textit{B. Calmès} et al., Compos. Math. 142, No. 4, 1063--1080 (2006; Zbl 1111.14008)]. In this paper, the author ask a slightly different question: suppose that any two decompositions of \(M\) into a direct sum of indecomposable objects become equivalent after base-change to an algebraic closure of \(F\). Is it true that these two decompositions are equivalent? If this is the case, we say that \(M\) satisfies the relative Krull-Schmidt property. The previously known counterexamples to the Krull-Schmidt principle do not provide counterexamples to the relative Krull-Schmidt principle. The main result of this paper is Theorem 3.3. It is a general statement relating decompositions of \(M\) into direct sums of indecomposable objects after base-change and extension of ring of coefficients. Theorem 3.3 is used in Section 5 to show that the relative Krull-Schmidt principle holds for a wide class of projective homogeneous varieties, but fails for some twisted flag variety. The paper also includes results concerning motives with coefficients in a discrete valuation ring (Section 4), and results concerning decomposability of integral motives of generalized Severi-Brauer varieties (Section 5). For instance, it is shown that the classical Severi-Brauer varieties together with the examples previously studied by \textit{N. A. Karpenko} [St. Petersbg. Math. J. 7, No. 4, 649--661 (1996; Zbl 0866.14006); translation from Algebra Anal. 7, No. 4, 196--213 (1995)] are the only generalized Severi-Brauer varieties whose integral motive is indecomposable. / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / reviewed by
 
Property / reviewed by: Charles Vial / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Mathematics Subject Classification ID
 
Property / Mathematics Subject Classification ID: 14C15 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / zbMATH DE Number
 
Property / zbMATH DE Number: 6488199 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / MaRDI profile type
 
Property / MaRDI profile type: MaRDI publication profile / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / OpenAlex ID
 
Property / OpenAlex ID: W1970837387 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / arXiv ID
 
Property / arXiv ID: 1312.2480 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q5562621 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Failure of Krull-Schmidt for invertible lattices over a discrete valuation ring / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q3999894 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: A short proof of Rost nilpotence via refined correspondences / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Chow motives of twisted flag varieties / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Motivic decomposition of isotropic projective homogeneous varieties / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Motivic decomposition of projective homogeneous varieties and the Krull-Schmidt theorem / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Some new examples in the theory of quadratic forms / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Motivic rigidity of Severi-Brauer varieties / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q3516073 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Shells of twisted flag varieties and the Rost invariant / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: The Rost nilpotence theorem for geometrically rational surfaces / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: On Chow motives of surfaces / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Lifting of Coefficients for Chow Motives of Quadrics / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q4870249 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q4523450 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Upper Motives of Outer Algebraic Groups / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Upper motives of algebraic groups and incompressibility of Severi–Brauer varieties / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q4210545 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Motivic decomposition of anisotropic varieties of type F<sub>4</sub>into generalized Rost motives / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: $J$-invariant of linear algebraic groups / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Linear algebraic groups. / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q4466498 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Algebraic cobordisms of a Pfister quadric / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Motivic splitting lemma / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Motivic decomposability of generalized Severi-Brauer varieties / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Decompositions of motives of generalized Severi-Brauer varieties / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / DOI
 
Property / DOI: 10.1007/S00208-014-1158-8 / rank
 
Normal rank
links / mardi / namelinks / mardi / name
 

Latest revision as of 19:32, 9 December 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Integral motives, relative Krull-Schmidt principle, and Maranda-type theorems
scientific article

    Statements

    Integral motives, relative Krull-Schmidt principle, and Maranda-type theorems (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    1 October 2015
    0 references
    This article is concerned with Chow motives with integral coefficients that are geometrically split. A Chow motive \(M\) over a field \(F\) is said to be geometrically split if there exists a field extension \(E/F\) such that the base change \(M_E\) is isomorphic to a direct sum of Tate motives. Examples of geometrically split motives are given by the motives of projective homogeneous varieties. A motive \(M\) is said to satisfy the Krull-Schmidt property if any two decompositions of \(M\) into a direct sum of indecomposable objects are equivalent (i.e., isomorphic up to reordering of the direct summands). This property had already been investigated for projective homogeneous varieties: for example, it holds for certain twisted flag varieties satisfying certain conditions [\textit{V. Chernousov} and \textit{A. Merkurjev}, Transform. Groups 11, No. 3, 371--386 (2006; Zbl 1111.14009)] and for projective quadrics [\textit{A. Vishik}, Lect. Notes Math. 1835, 25--101 (2004; Zbl 1047.11033)], but it fails in some cases [Chernousov and Merkurjev, loc. cit.], [\textit{B. Calmès} et al., Compos. Math. 142, No. 4, 1063--1080 (2006; Zbl 1111.14008)]. In this paper, the author ask a slightly different question: suppose that any two decompositions of \(M\) into a direct sum of indecomposable objects become equivalent after base-change to an algebraic closure of \(F\). Is it true that these two decompositions are equivalent? If this is the case, we say that \(M\) satisfies the relative Krull-Schmidt property. The previously known counterexamples to the Krull-Schmidt principle do not provide counterexamples to the relative Krull-Schmidt principle. The main result of this paper is Theorem 3.3. It is a general statement relating decompositions of \(M\) into direct sums of indecomposable objects after base-change and extension of ring of coefficients. Theorem 3.3 is used in Section 5 to show that the relative Krull-Schmidt principle holds for a wide class of projective homogeneous varieties, but fails for some twisted flag variety. The paper also includes results concerning motives with coefficients in a discrete valuation ring (Section 4), and results concerning decomposability of integral motives of generalized Severi-Brauer varieties (Section 5). For instance, it is shown that the classical Severi-Brauer varieties together with the examples previously studied by \textit{N. A. Karpenko} [St. Petersbg. Math. J. 7, No. 4, 649--661 (1996; Zbl 0866.14006); translation from Algebra Anal. 7, No. 4, 196--213 (1995)] are the only generalized Severi-Brauer varieties whose integral motive is indecomposable.
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references

    Identifiers