On the tallest column (Q554091): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Importer (talk | contribs)
Created a new Item
 
Set OpenAlex properties.
 
(3 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Property / review text
 
The problem of the strongest heavy column subject to elastic instability was formulated by \textit{F. I. Niordsen} [Q. Appl. Math. 23, 47--53 (1965; Zbl 0127.16103)]. Their solution was successively questioned by \textit{S. J. Cox} and \textit{C. M. McCarthy} [SIAM J. Math. Anal. 29, No. 3, 547--554 (1998; Zbl 0913.34072); ibid. 31, No. 4, 940--940 (2000; Zbl 0957.34073)] who remarked that the existence of an optimal column cannot be granted in advance. In the present paper the author shows, with arguments of monotonicity, that the solution exists and is unique. The result is interesting, but a restrictive assumption on the quadratic relationship between the area of the cross-section and its moment of inertia excludes a wide class of technically relevant cases.
Property / review text: The problem of the strongest heavy column subject to elastic instability was formulated by \textit{F. I. Niordsen} [Q. Appl. Math. 23, 47--53 (1965; Zbl 0127.16103)]. Their solution was successively questioned by \textit{S. J. Cox} and \textit{C. M. McCarthy} [SIAM J. Math. Anal. 29, No. 3, 547--554 (1998; Zbl 0913.34072); ibid. 31, No. 4, 940--940 (2000; Zbl 0957.34073)] who remarked that the existence of an optimal column cannot be granted in advance. In the present paper the author shows, with arguments of monotonicity, that the solution exists and is unique. The result is interesting, but a restrictive assumption on the quadratic relationship between the area of the cross-section and its moment of inertia excludes a wide class of technically relevant cases. / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / reviewed by
 
Property / reviewed by: Piero Villaggio / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Mathematics Subject Classification ID
 
Property / Mathematics Subject Classification ID: 74P10 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Mathematics Subject Classification ID
 
Property / Mathematics Subject Classification ID: 74K10 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Mathematics Subject Classification ID
 
Property / Mathematics Subject Classification ID: 74G25 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Mathematics Subject Classification ID
 
Property / Mathematics Subject Classification ID: 74G30 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / zbMATH DE Number
 
Property / zbMATH DE Number: 5934037 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / zbMATH Keywords
 
min-max problem
Property / zbMATH Keywords: min-max problem / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / zbMATH Keywords
 
existence
Property / zbMATH Keywords: existence / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / zbMATH Keywords
 
uniqueness
Property / zbMATH Keywords: uniqueness / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / zbMATH Keywords
 
monotonicity
Property / zbMATH Keywords: monotonicity / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / MaRDI profile type
 
Property / MaRDI profile type: MaRDI publication profile / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / full work available at URL
 
Property / full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crme.2010.05.001 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / OpenAlex ID
 
Property / OpenAlex ID: W2109849179 / rank
 
Normal rank
links / mardi / namelinks / mardi / name
 

Latest revision as of 01:22, 20 March 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
On the tallest column
scientific article

    Statements

    On the tallest column (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    29 July 2011
    0 references
    The problem of the strongest heavy column subject to elastic instability was formulated by \textit{F. I. Niordsen} [Q. Appl. Math. 23, 47--53 (1965; Zbl 0127.16103)]. Their solution was successively questioned by \textit{S. J. Cox} and \textit{C. M. McCarthy} [SIAM J. Math. Anal. 29, No. 3, 547--554 (1998; Zbl 0913.34072); ibid. 31, No. 4, 940--940 (2000; Zbl 0957.34073)] who remarked that the existence of an optimal column cannot be granted in advance. In the present paper the author shows, with arguments of monotonicity, that the solution exists and is unique. The result is interesting, but a restrictive assumption on the quadratic relationship between the area of the cross-section and its moment of inertia excludes a wide class of technically relevant cases.
    0 references
    min-max problem
    0 references
    existence
    0 references
    uniqueness
    0 references
    monotonicity
    0 references

    Identifiers

    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references