Klein's paradox and the relativistic point interaction (Q583571): Difference between revisions
From MaRDI portal
Created a new Item |
ReferenceBot (talk | contribs) Changed an Item |
||
(5 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown) | |||
Property / author | |||
Property / author: Petr Šeba / rank | |||
Property / review text | |||
The author treats the one-dimensional Dirac operator \[ H_0(m)=- i(d/dx)\otimes \sigma_ 1+m\otimes \sigma_3\] with mass \(m\) defined in the two compact spinor Hilbert space \(H=L^2(\mathbb R)\otimes C^2\), where \(\sigma_1\) and \(\sigma_3\) are Pauli matrices. Let \[ H_{\alpha}(m)=H_0(m)+\alpha \delta(x),\quad \tilde H_{\beta}(m)=H_0(m)+\beta \delta(x)\otimes \sigma_3,\] \[ H_{\varepsilon}(m)=H_0(m)+(1/\varepsilon)V(x/\varepsilon),\quad \tilde H_{\varepsilon}(m)=H_0(m)+(1/\varepsilon)V(x/\varepsilon)\otimes \sigma_3.\] When the formula \(\int_{\mathbb R}\delta(x)\cdot f(x)\,dx=\{f(0_+)+f(0_- )\}/2\) and the integration by parts are used, the equations \(H_{\alpha}(m)f(x)=Ef(x),\) and \(\tilde H_{\beta}(m)f(x)=Ef(x)\) yield the boundary condition defining \(H_{\alpha}(m)\) and \(\tilde H_{\beta}(m)\). However two relations \(\lim_{\varepsilon \to 0}H_{\varepsilon}(m)=H_{\alpha}(m),\) and \(\lim_{\varepsilon \to 0}\tilde H_{\varepsilon}(m)=\tilde H_{\beta}(m)\) for \(\alpha =\beta =\int V(x)dx\) do not hold. He compares \((H_{\varepsilon}(m)-E)^{-1}\) and \((H_{\alpha}(m)-E)^{-1},\) and shows that the operators \(H_{\varepsilon}(m)\) and \(\tilde H_{\varepsilon}(m)\) converge to the point interaction Hamiltonians \(H_{\alpha}(m)\) and \(\tilde H_{\beta}(m)\), with the coupling constants \(\alpha\), \(\beta\) being nonlinear functionals of the \(V\). That is, let \(V\in C^{\infty}_0(\mathbb R)\), \(u(x)=| V(x)|^{1/2},\) \(v(x)=| V(x)|^{1/2} \operatorname{sgn}V(x)\), \(K\) be an integral operator with a kernel \(K(x,y)=(i/2)u(x)\operatorname{sgn}(x-y)v(y),\) and \((\cdot; \cdot)_{L^2(\mathbb R)}\) denote the scalar product in \(L^2(\mathbb R)\). His results are \[ \text{NR } \lim_{\varepsilon \to 0}H_{\varepsilon}(m)=H_{\alpha}(m)\quad \text{with } \alpha = (v;(1-K^ 2)^{-1} u)_{L^2(\mathbb R)},\] and \[ \text{NR } \lim_{\varepsilon \to 0}\tilde H_{\varepsilon}(m)=\tilde H_{\beta}(m)\quad\text{with } \beta =(v;(1+K^2)^{-1} u)_{L^2(\mathbb R)}. \] Here NR lim means the one in the norm-resolvent topology. | |||
Property / review text: The author treats the one-dimensional Dirac operator \[ H_0(m)=- i(d/dx)\otimes \sigma_ 1+m\otimes \sigma_3\] with mass \(m\) defined in the two compact spinor Hilbert space \(H=L^2(\mathbb R)\otimes C^2\), where \(\sigma_1\) and \(\sigma_3\) are Pauli matrices. Let \[ H_{\alpha}(m)=H_0(m)+\alpha \delta(x),\quad \tilde H_{\beta}(m)=H_0(m)+\beta \delta(x)\otimes \sigma_3,\] \[ H_{\varepsilon}(m)=H_0(m)+(1/\varepsilon)V(x/\varepsilon),\quad \tilde H_{\varepsilon}(m)=H_0(m)+(1/\varepsilon)V(x/\varepsilon)\otimes \sigma_3.\] When the formula \(\int_{\mathbb R}\delta(x)\cdot f(x)\,dx=\{f(0_+)+f(0_- )\}/2\) and the integration by parts are used, the equations \(H_{\alpha}(m)f(x)=Ef(x),\) and \(\tilde H_{\beta}(m)f(x)=Ef(x)\) yield the boundary condition defining \(H_{\alpha}(m)\) and \(\tilde H_{\beta}(m)\). However two relations \(\lim_{\varepsilon \to 0}H_{\varepsilon}(m)=H_{\alpha}(m),\) and \(\lim_{\varepsilon \to 0}\tilde H_{\varepsilon}(m)=\tilde H_{\beta}(m)\) for \(\alpha =\beta =\int V(x)dx\) do not hold. He compares \((H_{\varepsilon}(m)-E)^{-1}\) and \((H_{\alpha}(m)-E)^{-1},\) and shows that the operators \(H_{\varepsilon}(m)\) and \(\tilde H_{\varepsilon}(m)\) converge to the point interaction Hamiltonians \(H_{\alpha}(m)\) and \(\tilde H_{\beta}(m)\), with the coupling constants \(\alpha\), \(\beta\) being nonlinear functionals of the \(V\). That is, let \(V\in C^{\infty}_0(\mathbb R)\), \(u(x)=| V(x)|^{1/2},\) \(v(x)=| V(x)|^{1/2} \operatorname{sgn}V(x)\), \(K\) be an integral operator with a kernel \(K(x,y)=(i/2)u(x)\operatorname{sgn}(x-y)v(y),\) and \((\cdot; \cdot)_{L^2(\mathbb R)}\) denote the scalar product in \(L^2(\mathbb R)\). His results are \[ \text{NR } \lim_{\varepsilon \to 0}H_{\varepsilon}(m)=H_{\alpha}(m)\quad \text{with } \alpha = (v;(1-K^ 2)^{-1} u)_{L^2(\mathbb R)},\] and \[ \text{NR } \lim_{\varepsilon \to 0}\tilde H_{\varepsilon}(m)=\tilde H_{\beta}(m)\quad\text{with } \beta =(v;(1+K^2)^{-1} u)_{L^2(\mathbb R)}. \] Here NR lim means the one in the norm-resolvent topology. / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / reviewed by | |||
Property / reviewed by: Hideo Yamagata / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / Mathematics Subject Classification ID | |||
Property / Mathematics Subject Classification ID: 81Q05 / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / Mathematics Subject Classification ID | |||
Property / Mathematics Subject Classification ID: 81Q10 / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / Mathematics Subject Classification ID | |||
Property / Mathematics Subject Classification ID: 46N50 / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / zbMATH DE Number | |||
Property / zbMATH DE Number: 4132930 / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / zbMATH Keywords | |||
Klein's paradox | |||
Property / zbMATH Keywords: Klein's paradox / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / zbMATH Keywords | |||
relativistic point interaction | |||
Property / zbMATH Keywords: relativistic point interaction / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / zbMATH Keywords | |||
one-dimensional Dirac operator | |||
Property / zbMATH Keywords: one-dimensional Dirac operator / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / zbMATH Keywords | |||
spinor Hilbert space | |||
Property / zbMATH Keywords: spinor Hilbert space / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / zbMATH Keywords | |||
Pauli matrices | |||
Property / zbMATH Keywords: Pauli matrices / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / zbMATH Keywords | |||
point interaction Hamiltonians | |||
Property / zbMATH Keywords: point interaction Hamiltonians / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / zbMATH Keywords | |||
coupling constants | |||
Property / zbMATH Keywords: coupling constants / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / author | |||
Property / author: Petr Šeba / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / MaRDI profile type | |||
Property / MaRDI profile type: MaRDI publication profile / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: Quantum mechanics of electrons in crystal lattices / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: The effect of submanifolds upon essential self-adjointness and deficiency indices / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: Quantization of fermions interacting with point-like external fields / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: New analytically solvable models of relativistic point interactions / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
links / mardi / name | links / mardi / name | ||
Latest revision as of 12:04, 20 June 2024
scientific article
Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
---|---|---|---|
English | Klein's paradox and the relativistic point interaction |
scientific article |
Statements
Klein's paradox and the relativistic point interaction (English)
0 references
1989
0 references
The author treats the one-dimensional Dirac operator \[ H_0(m)=- i(d/dx)\otimes \sigma_ 1+m\otimes \sigma_3\] with mass \(m\) defined in the two compact spinor Hilbert space \(H=L^2(\mathbb R)\otimes C^2\), where \(\sigma_1\) and \(\sigma_3\) are Pauli matrices. Let \[ H_{\alpha}(m)=H_0(m)+\alpha \delta(x),\quad \tilde H_{\beta}(m)=H_0(m)+\beta \delta(x)\otimes \sigma_3,\] \[ H_{\varepsilon}(m)=H_0(m)+(1/\varepsilon)V(x/\varepsilon),\quad \tilde H_{\varepsilon}(m)=H_0(m)+(1/\varepsilon)V(x/\varepsilon)\otimes \sigma_3.\] When the formula \(\int_{\mathbb R}\delta(x)\cdot f(x)\,dx=\{f(0_+)+f(0_- )\}/2\) and the integration by parts are used, the equations \(H_{\alpha}(m)f(x)=Ef(x),\) and \(\tilde H_{\beta}(m)f(x)=Ef(x)\) yield the boundary condition defining \(H_{\alpha}(m)\) and \(\tilde H_{\beta}(m)\). However two relations \(\lim_{\varepsilon \to 0}H_{\varepsilon}(m)=H_{\alpha}(m),\) and \(\lim_{\varepsilon \to 0}\tilde H_{\varepsilon}(m)=\tilde H_{\beta}(m)\) for \(\alpha =\beta =\int V(x)dx\) do not hold. He compares \((H_{\varepsilon}(m)-E)^{-1}\) and \((H_{\alpha}(m)-E)^{-1},\) and shows that the operators \(H_{\varepsilon}(m)\) and \(\tilde H_{\varepsilon}(m)\) converge to the point interaction Hamiltonians \(H_{\alpha}(m)\) and \(\tilde H_{\beta}(m)\), with the coupling constants \(\alpha\), \(\beta\) being nonlinear functionals of the \(V\). That is, let \(V\in C^{\infty}_0(\mathbb R)\), \(u(x)=| V(x)|^{1/2},\) \(v(x)=| V(x)|^{1/2} \operatorname{sgn}V(x)\), \(K\) be an integral operator with a kernel \(K(x,y)=(i/2)u(x)\operatorname{sgn}(x-y)v(y),\) and \((\cdot; \cdot)_{L^2(\mathbb R)}\) denote the scalar product in \(L^2(\mathbb R)\). His results are \[ \text{NR } \lim_{\varepsilon \to 0}H_{\varepsilon}(m)=H_{\alpha}(m)\quad \text{with } \alpha = (v;(1-K^ 2)^{-1} u)_{L^2(\mathbb R)},\] and \[ \text{NR } \lim_{\varepsilon \to 0}\tilde H_{\varepsilon}(m)=\tilde H_{\beta}(m)\quad\text{with } \beta =(v;(1+K^2)^{-1} u)_{L^2(\mathbb R)}. \] Here NR lim means the one in the norm-resolvent topology.
0 references
Klein's paradox
0 references
relativistic point interaction
0 references
one-dimensional Dirac operator
0 references
spinor Hilbert space
0 references
Pauli matrices
0 references
point interaction Hamiltonians
0 references
coupling constants
0 references