Bounded revision: two-dimensional belief change between conservative and moderate revision (Q421343): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Importer (talk | contribs)
Changed an Item
ReferenceBot (talk | contribs)
Changed an Item
 
(3 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Property / MaRDI profile type
 
Property / MaRDI profile type: MaRDI publication profile / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / full work available at URL
 
Property / full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10992-011-9206-2 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / OpenAlex ID
 
Property / OpenAlex ID: W2061740221 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: On the logic of theory change: Partial meet contraction and revision functions / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q3624012 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: On the logic of iterated belief revision / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Revision by comparison / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q3901465 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q3107917 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q3495345 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Two modellings for theory change / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q4692959 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: The measurement of ranks and the laws of iterated contraction / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Contracting from epistemic hell is routine / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Counterfactuals and comparative possibility / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q4260397 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Dynamic belief revision operators / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Avoiding epistemic hell: Levi on pragmatism and inconsistency / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Severe withdrawal (and recovery) / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q4546707 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q4260399 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q2771723 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Basic entrenchment / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Coherence and Conservatism in the Dynamics of Belief II: Iterated Belief Change without Dispositional Coherence / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Revision by comparison as a unifying framework: Severe withdrawal, irrevocable revision and irrefutable revision / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Shifting Priorities: Simple Representations for Twenty-Seven Iterated Theory Change Operators / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Irrevocable belief revision in dynamic doxastic logic / rank
 
Normal rank
links / mardi / namelinks / mardi / name
 

Latest revision as of 07:08, 5 July 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Bounded revision: two-dimensional belief change between conservative and moderate revision
scientific article

    Statements

    Bounded revision: two-dimensional belief change between conservative and moderate revision (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    23 May 2012
    0 references
    The paper develops the idea of belief revision as a comparative operation, in the sense that the input proposition is compared with a reference proposition, and what is done to the belief state depends on the relationship between them. The idea has its roots in \textit{J. Cantwell}'s [``On the logic of small changes in hypertheories'', Theoria 63, No. 1--2, 54--89 (1997)] and \textit{E. Fermé} and \textit{H. Rott}'s [``Revision by comparison'', Artif. Intell. 157, No. 1--2, 5--47 (2004; Zbl 1085.03013)]. For example, in the latter publication, if the reference item is more entrenched than the negation of the input, then we revise by the input; if on the other hand it is not, then we carry out a `severe withdrawal' of the reference. Evidently, that operation involves elements of both revision and contraction, so it does not satisfy the AGM postulates for either one alone. Accordingly, in two texts of 2007 that are available on the web though not in print, the author began work on a modified version that is purely revisionary, still non-numerical, and more general in that the reference proposition need not be an element of the belief set. That construction is carried to completion in the paper under review. A central idea is that the reference sentence should not influence the propositional content of the new belief set, but only the strength with which the input is accepted; after revision, it should be marginally more than that of the reference proposition. Semantically, a belief state is modeled by a system of spheres or (equivalently) an entrenchment ordering of formulae. The resulting system satisfies the AGM postulates for one-shot revision and also the Darwiche-Pearl postulates for its iteration. In the limiting cases that the reference proposition is a tautology or a contradiction, it generates the familiar systems known, respectively, as moderate (aka lexicographic) and conservative (aka natural) revision.
    0 references
    belief revision
    0 references
    AGM
    0 references
    iterated revision
    0 references
    sphere semantics
    0 references
    epistemic entrenchment
    0 references

    Identifiers