The logical representation of extensive games (Q687063): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Importer (talk | contribs)
Created a new Item
 
ReferenceBot (talk | contribs)
Changed an Item
 
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Property / MaRDI profile type
 
Property / MaRDI profile type: Publication / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Some notes on Church's thesis and the theory of games / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Extensive forms and set-theoretic forms / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Rationality, Computability, and Nash Equilibrium / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q5515142 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Final decisions, the Nash equilibrium and solvability in games with common knowledge of logical abilities / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Mathematical logic. An introduction to model theory. Edited by H. B. Enderton / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q5734410 / rank
 
Normal rank
links / mardi / namelinks / mardi / name
 

Latest revision as of 10:15, 22 May 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
The logical representation of extensive games
scientific article

    Statements

    The logical representation of extensive games (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    4 January 1994
    0 references
    Given is an extensive form \(G\) in which every choice is associated an atomic sentence and with every information set a set of well-formed formulas (wffs) of propositional calculus. The set of such wffs is denoted by \(\Gamma(G)\). Using the so-called topological semantics for propositional calculus (which differs from the standard one based on truth tables), it is shown that the extensive form yields a topological model of \(\Gamma(G)\), that is, every wff in \(\Gamma(G)\) is ``true in \(G\)''. It is also shown that within the standard truth-table semantics for propositional calculus, there is a one-to-one and onto correspondence between the set of plays of \(G\) and the set of valuations that satisfy all the wffs in \(\Gamma(G)\).
    0 references
    extensive form
    0 references
    well-formed formulas
    0 references
    propositional calculus
    0 references
    topological semantics
    0 references

    Identifiers