Kripke semantics and proof systems for combining intuitionistic logic and classical logic (Q690929): Difference between revisions
From MaRDI portal
Created a new Item |
m rollbackEdits.php mass rollback Tag: Rollback |
||
(8 intermediate revisions by 7 users not shown) | |||
Property / DOI | |||
Property / DOI: 10.1016/j.apal.2012.09.005 / rank | |||
Property / author | |||
Property / author: Dale A. Miller / rank | |||
Property / reviewed by | |||
Property / reviewed by: Branislav R. Boričić / rank | |||
Property / author | |||
Property / author: Dale A. Miller / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / reviewed by | |||
Property / reviewed by: Branislav R. Boričić / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / MaRDI profile type | |||
Property / MaRDI profile type: Publication / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / full work available at URL | |||
Property / full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apal.2012.09.005 / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / OpenAlex ID | |||
Property / OpenAlex ID: W2009938424 / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / DOI | |||
Property / DOI: 10.1016/J.APAL.2012.09.005 / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
links / mardi / name | links / mardi / name | ||
Latest revision as of 15:25, 21 February 2025
scientific article
Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
---|---|---|---|
English | Kripke semantics and proof systems for combining intuitionistic logic and classical logic |
scientific article |
Statements
Kripke semantics and proof systems for combining intuitionistic logic and classical logic (English)
0 references
29 November 2012
0 references
The basic question discussed here is whether the critical intuitionistic connectives of implication and universal quantification can retain their strength when combined with classical connectives. In order to combine intuitionistic and classical logic the authors introduce a first-order predicate logic called polarized intuitionistic logic (PIL) based on a distinction between two dual polarities defined model-theoretically by means of the Kripke-type semantics for this logic. The proof-theoretical treatment of PIL includes two proof systems: the first one extending Gentzen's sequent calculus for intuitionistic logic, and the second one based on a semantic tableau extending Dragalin's multiple-conclusion sequent calculus for intuitionistic logic. The corresponding soundness and completeness results are obtained having as consequence the admissibility of the cut rule. Various double-negation translations, dual-intuitionistic logic, linear logic, PIL etc. are discussed in the final part of the paper.
0 references
classical logic
0 references
intuitionistic logic
0 references
hybrid Kripke models
0 references
soundness
0 references
completeness
0 references
polarized logic
0 references
sequent calculus
0 references
combining logics
0 references