Project:Weekly/20221121: Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Created page with "Naming convention for Weekly — example: "Project:Weekly/20220218" == Basic Info == Attendees: Johannes, Daniel, Eloi, Olaf Protocol by: Eloi == Organizational Topics == * Internal Mardi Workshop TA5. Hybrid format in Berlin, 28. November. == Literature Review Topics == * Daniel: Literature Review should focus on the FAIR criteria that are not fulfilled to identify the weaknesses of current platforms. The FAIR table we are working on should support this proce..."
 
formatting
 
Line 1: Line 1:
Naming convention for Weekly — example: "Project:Weekly/20220218"


== Basic Info ==
== Basic Info ==


Attendees: Johannes, Daniel, Eloi, Olaf
Attendees: Johannes, Daniel, Eloi, Olaf
Line 11: Line 8:
== Organizational Topics ==
== Organizational Topics ==
* Internal Mardi Workshop TA5. Hybrid format in Berlin, 28. November.
* Internal Mardi Workshop TA5. Hybrid format in Berlin, 28. November.
== Literature Review Topics ==
== Literature Review Topics ==


* Daniel: Literature Review should focus on the FAIR criteria that are not fulfilled to identify the weaknesses of current platforms. The FAIR table we are working on should support this process. It might not be meaningful to fill the table in extreme detail for the FAIR criteria that do not represent a problem in the current platform landscape.
* Daniel: Literature Review should focus on the FAIR criteria that are not fulfilled to identify the weaknesses of current platforms. The FAIR table we are working on should support this process. It might not be meaningful to fill the table in extreme detail for the FAIR criteria that do not represent a problem in the current platform landscape.

Latest revision as of 10:22, 21 November 2022

Basic Info

Attendees: Johannes, Daniel, Eloi, Olaf

Protocol by: Eloi

Organizational Topics

  • Internal Mardi Workshop TA5. Hybrid format in Berlin, 28. November.

Literature Review Topics

  • Daniel: Literature Review should focus on the FAIR criteria that are not fulfilled to identify the weaknesses of current platforms. The FAIR table we are working on should support this process. It might not be meaningful to fill the table in extreme detail for the FAIR criteria that do not represent a problem in the current platform landscape.