Normality criteria for families of meromorphic functions (Q5903902): Difference between revisions
From MaRDI portal
Created a new Item |
Added link to MaRDI item. |
||
links / mardi / name | links / mardi / name | ||
Revision as of 03:36, 31 January 2024
scientific article; zbMATH DE number 4091825
Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
---|---|---|---|
English | Normality criteria for families of meromorphic functions |
scientific article; zbMATH DE number 4091825 |
Statements
Normality criteria for families of meromorphic functions (English)
0 references
1989
0 references
This paper presents the state-of-art technology of using Nevanlinna's calculus to obtain normal-family criteria. It starts from the beginning, even recalling Nevanlinna's ``fundamental theorems'', but is beautifully developed. The idea is to show that if F is a family of meromorphic functions on a domain G of the plane, and if say \(z=0\) is in G, then \[ (*)\quad T(r,f)=O(1)\quad for\quad all\quad f\in F\quad for\quad 0<r<r_ 0, \] for some \(r_ 0>0\). Such an estimate shows that F is normal for example, near 0. The complication is that the standard calculus yields bounds in which the right side of (*) often involves intricate error terms i.e. terms which involve f and its derivatives at 0 and the problem becomes to control these. The author's approach depends on three ingredients. The first is now standard, and involves making infinitesimal changes of the origin to control many of these error terms, assuming always that F is not normal near 0. The second is making full use of the ``Lohwater-Piranian-Zalcman principle'' that if F is not normal at 0, there exist \(\rho_ j\to 0\), \(z_ j\to 0\), a sequence \(f_ j\in F\), and a nonconstant function g(z); meromorphic in the plane, such that \(f_ j(z_ j+\rho_ jz)\to g(z),\) this makes it possible to control what would otherwise be error terms of hopeless complexity. Finally, there is an interesting use of techniques of G. Frank and G./W. Hennekemper which heretofore have been applied to fixed differential polynomials. The new criteria include: (1) if \(n\geq k+4\), \(a\neq 0\) and \(f^{(k)}(z)+P(z,f)-af^ n\) omits a fixed value b for all (f\(\in F)\), where P is a fixed linear differential polynomial with analytic coefficients involving derivatives of order \(\leq k-1\) in f; (2) if \((f^ n)^{(k)}\neq 1\) in G and either \(n\geq k+1\) with F an analytic family or \(n\geq k+3\) with F meromorphic. The final two criteria are of a different nature. The families considered now satisfy (1) \(f^{(k)}(z)\neq 0\) for all integers k or (2) \(ff^{(k)}\neq 0\) for a fixed \(k\geq 2\) (if F is an analytic family) or \(k\geq 3\) (meromorphic case). The conclusion now is that the logarithmic derivatives of functions in F form a normal family. Note: In the statement of Theorem 3.2, ``meromorphic'' should be replaced by ``analytic''.
0 references
differential polynomials
0 references
normal family
0 references