Estimating covariance matrices (Q1175405): Difference between revisions
From MaRDI portal
Added link to MaRDI item. |
Removed claim: reviewed by (P1447): Item:Q367536 |
||
Property / reviewed by | |||
Property / reviewed by: Q586072 / rank | |||
Revision as of 21:38, 13 February 2024
scientific article
Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
---|---|---|---|
English | Estimating covariance matrices |
scientific article |
Statements
Estimating covariance matrices (English)
0 references
25 June 1992
0 references
Let \(S_ 1\sim W_ p(\Sigma_ 1,n_ 1)\) and \(S_ 2\sim W_ p(\Sigma_ 2,n_ 2)\) be two independent \(p\times p\) Wishart matrices. It is desired to consider the minimax estimation of \((\Sigma_ 1,\Sigma_ 2)\) under the loss function \[ \sum_{i=1}^ 2\{\hbox {tr}(\Sigma_ i^{-1}\hat\Sigma_ i-\log| \Sigma_ i^{- 1}\hat\Sigma_ i|-p\}, \] extending known results for a single matrix. The aim is to get substantial savings in risk when the eigenvalues of \(\Sigma_ 2 \Sigma_ 1^{-1}\) are close together; this would be useful when there is prior information that the \(\Sigma_ i\)'s are approximately proportional and their eigenvalues are likely to be far apart. The approach is to first utilize the principle of invariance to narrow the class of estimators under consideration to the equivariant ones. The unbiased estimates of risk of these estimators are then computed and promising estimators are derived from them. A Monte Carlo study is conducted to evaluate the risk performance of the following estimators: best usual, minimax, adjusted usual, \textit{D. K. Dey} and \textit{C. Srinivasan} [see ibid. 13, 1581-1591 (1985; Zbl 0582.62042)], \textit{L. R. Haff} [ibid. 8, 586-597 (1980; Zbl 0441.62045)], and Stein, where the last three have been proposed by the indicated authors.
0 references
covariance matrix
0 references
Stein's loss
0 references
equivariance
0 references
Wishart matrices
0 references
minimax estimation
0 references
eigenvalues
0 references
principle of invariance
0 references
unbiased estimates of risk
0 references
Monte Carlo study
0 references
risk performance
0 references