On some new explicit evaluations of class invariants (Q935663): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Importer (talk | contribs)
Created a new Item
 
Added link to MaRDI item.
links / mardi / namelinks / mardi / name
 

Revision as of 17:42, 30 January 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
On some new explicit evaluations of class invariants
scientific article

    Statements

    On some new explicit evaluations of class invariants (English)
    0 references
    12 August 2008
    0 references
    The Ramanujan-Weber class invariants \(G_n\) and \(g_n\) are \[ G_n := 2^{-1/4}q^{-1/24}\chi(q) \qquad\text{ and }\qquad g_n := 2^{-1/4}q^{-1/24}\chi(-q), \] where \(\chi(q) = (1+q)(1+q^3)(1+q^5)\cdots \) and \( q = e^{-\pi \sqrt{n}}. \) A number of values of \(G_n\) and \(g_n\) are given in this paper. Specifically, \(G_n\) is evaluated for \[ n = 30,10/3,42,14/3,78,26/3,102,34/3, \] while \(g_n\) is evaluated for \[ \begin{gathered} n = 15,5/3,21,7/3,33,11/3,39,13/3,57,19/3,93,31/3,177,59/3, \\ 60,20/3,84,28/3,120,40/3,132,44/3,156,52/3,168,56/3, \\ 228,76/3,312,104/3, 372,124/3,408,136/3. \end{gathered} \] The evaluations of \(G_n\), and \(g_n\) with \(n\) odd, are obtained using modular equations, other known class invariant evaluations, and relations involving \(G_n\), \(G_{9n}\), \(g_n\), \(g_{4n}\), \(g_{9n}\), and \(g_{36n}\). Details are given for \(G_{30}\), \(G_{10/3}\), \(g_{15}\) and \(g_{5/3}\), and the remaining cases are left to the reader. The evaluations of \(g_n\) with \(n\) even follow from the fact that \(g_{4n} = 2^{1/4}G_ng_n\). Values of the singular modulus \(\alpha_n\) (whose definition we do not give here, but which is equal to \((G_ng_{4n})^{-8}\)) are also recorded, for \[ \begin{gathered} n = 15,5/3,21,7/3,30,10/3,33,11/3,39,13/3,42,14/3, \\ 57,19/3,78,26/3,93,31/3,102,34/3.\end{gathered} \] The reader should be alerted that it will be necessary to consult Section 34 of [\textit{B. C. Berndt}, Ramanujan's notebooks. Part V. New York, NY: Springer (1998; Zbl 0886.11001)] for the known class invariant evaluations required for those proofs which are omitted. It might also be pointed out that in the authors' remark on p. \(123\), the identities numbered \((6.x)\) should be \((7.x)\).
    0 references
    Ramanujan-Weber class invariant
    0 references
    modular equations
    0 references
    hypergeometric series
    0 references
    singular moduli
    0 references
    elliptic integrals
    0 references

    Identifiers

    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references