Asymptotic decay under nonlinear and noncoercive dissipative effects for electrical conduction in biological tissues (Q503116): Difference between revisions
From MaRDI portal
Added link to MaRDI item. |
Set profile property. |
||
Property / MaRDI profile type | |||
Property / MaRDI profile type: MaRDI publication profile / rank | |||
Normal rank |
Revision as of 00:28, 5 March 2024
scientific article
Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
---|---|---|---|
English | Asymptotic decay under nonlinear and noncoercive dissipative effects for electrical conduction in biological tissues |
scientific article |
Statements
Asymptotic decay under nonlinear and noncoercive dissipative effects for electrical conduction in biological tissues (English)
0 references
11 January 2017
0 references
The authors analyze a model accounting for electrical conduction in biological tissues. They start from a smooth domain \(\Omega \subset \mathbb{ R}^{N}\), \(N\geq 2\) and a periodic open subset \(E\) of \(\mathbb{R}^{N}\). They define \(\Omega _{1}^{\varepsilon }=\Omega \cap \varepsilon E\), \( \Omega_{2}^{\varepsilon }=\Omega \setminus \varepsilon \overline{E}\), \(Y=(0,1)^{N}\), \(E_{1}=E\cap Y\), \(E_{2}=E\setminus \overline{Y}\) and \(\Gamma =\partial E\cap \overline{Y}\). They introduce the piecewise constant conductivity \(\sigma (y)=\sigma _{1}\) in \(E_{1}\) and \(\sigma (y)=\sigma _{2}\) in \(E_{2}\), where \(\sigma _{1}\) and \( \sigma _{2}\) are positive constants. They consider the problem \(-\operatorname{div} (\sigma ^{\varepsilon }\nabla u_{\varepsilon })=0\) in \((\Omega _{1}^{\varepsilon }\cup \Omega _{2}^{\varepsilon })\times (0,T)\) with the boundary conditions \([\sigma ^{\varepsilon }\nabla u_{\varepsilon }\cdot \nu _{\varepsilon }]=0\) on \(\Gamma ^{\varepsilon }\times (0,T)\), \(\frac{\alpha }{ \varepsilon }\frac{\partial }{\partial t}[u_{\varepsilon }]+f(\frac{ [u_{\varepsilon }]}{\varepsilon })=\sigma ^{\varepsilon }\nabla u_{\varepsilon }\cdot \nu _{\varepsilon }\) on \(\Gamma ^{\varepsilon }\times (0,T)\), \(u_{\varepsilon }(x)=\Psi (x,t)\) on \(\partial \Omega \times (0,T)\) and \([u_{\varepsilon }](x,0)=S_{\varepsilon }(x)\) on \(\Gamma ^{\varepsilon }\). Here, \(\alpha \) is a positive constant, \(f\) is a \(C^{1}\) function which is strictly monotone increasing and satisfies \(f(0)=0\) and \(f^{\prime }(s)\geq \delta _{0}>0\) for \(|s|\) large enough and \(\Psi (x,\cdot )\) is 1-periodic for a.e. \(x\in \Omega \). The authors use classical tools in order to prove an existence and uniqueness result for this problem. They first describe the asymptotic behavior of the solution \(u_{\varepsilon }\) when \(t\rightarrow \infty \). They prove that \(u_{\varepsilon }\) converges to the solution \( u_{\varepsilon }^{\#}\in C_{\#}^{1}([0,1];\mathcal{X}^{1}(\Omega _{\varepsilon }))\) of a quite similar problem but now posed in \((\Omega _{1}^{\varepsilon }\cup \Omega _{2}^{\varepsilon })\times \mathbb{R}\) for which they prove an existence and uniqueness result. For the proof, the authors first prove uniform estimates and obtain weak convergences. The main result of the paper describes a two-scale convergence result for the solution \(u_{\varepsilon }\) of the original problem. The authors first propose the limit problem and they establish its limit when \(t\rightarrow \infty \). They prove existence results and a convergence result when \(t\rightarrow \infty \) for this asymptotic problem. For the proof, they use classical tools from the two-scale convergence.
0 references
nonlinear homogenization
0 references
two-scale convergence
0 references
electrical impedance tomography
0 references