Why mathematical morphology needs complete lattices (Q811477): Difference between revisions
From MaRDI portal
Added link to MaRDI item. |
Removed claim: reviewed by (P1447): Item:Q167006 |
||
Property / reviewed by | |||
Property / reviewed by: Petr Kůrka / rank | |||
Revision as of 00:45, 10 February 2024
scientific article
Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
---|---|---|---|
English | Why mathematical morphology needs complete lattices |
scientific article |
Statements
Why mathematical morphology needs complete lattices (English)
0 references
1990
0 references
If \(L\) is a complete lattice, then \(d: L\to L\) is a dilatation (erosion) operator, if for any \(S\subseteq L\) \[ d(\sup S)=\sup_{X\in S}d(X)\qquad (d(\inf S)=\inf_{X\in S}d(X)). \] This is a generalization of the case that \(L\) is a power set of \(\mathbb Z^ d\). It is shown, that this generalization is necessary for a mathematically coherent application of morphological operators to grey-level images.
0 references
complete lattice
0 references
dilatation (erosion)
0 references
grey-level images
0 references