Integrally closed ideals on log terminal surfaces are multiplier ideals (Q971486): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Added link to MaRDI item.
Import240304020342 (talk | contribs)
Set profile property.
Property / MaRDI profile type
 
Property / MaRDI profile type: MaRDI publication profile / rank
 
Normal rank

Revision as of 01:46, 5 March 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Integrally closed ideals on log terminal surfaces are multiplier ideals
scientific article

    Statements

    Integrally closed ideals on log terminal surfaces are multiplier ideals (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    14 May 2010
    0 references
    In this short self-contained paper the author proves the following Theorem. If \(X\) is a log terminal two-dimensional affine variety, then every integrally closed ideal on \(X\) is a multiplier ideal of some pair \((X, \mathfrak{a}^t)\). This result was previously shown in the case when \(X\) was smooth by \textit{J. Lipman} and \textit{K.-i. Watanabe} [Math. Res. Lett. 10, No. 4, 423--434 (2003; Zbl 1049.13003)] and also by \textit{C. Favre} and \textit{M. Jonsson} [J. Am. Math. Soc. 18, No. 3, 655--684 (2005; Zbl 1075.14001)]. One should note that the hypotheses of the theorem are sharp: if \(X\) is not log terminal or not a surface, then the statement fails to be true [see for example \textit{R. Lazarsfeld} and \textit{K. Lee}, Invent. Math. 167, No. 2, 409--418 (2007; Zbl 1114.13013)]. However, as pointed out in the paper, in the case of a surface, one still might hope to extend the result outside of the log terminal case (perhaps to the rational case) by only looking at ideals contained in the multiplier ideal of the ambient variety.
    0 references
    0 references
    multiplier ideal
    0 references
    surface
    0 references
    integrally closed ideal
    0 references
    principal ideal
    0 references
    antinef closure
    0 references
    relative numerical decomposition
    0 references

    Identifiers