On a boundary Morera theorem for classical domains (Q1307145): Difference between revisions
From MaRDI portal
Added link to MaRDI item. |
Removed claims |
||
Property / author | |||
Property / author: Q345251 / rank | |||
Property / reviewed by | |||
Property / reviewed by: Q1125852 / rank | |||
Revision as of 23:10, 15 February 2024
scientific article
Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
---|---|---|---|
English | On a boundary Morera theorem for classical domains |
scientific article |
Statements
On a boundary Morera theorem for classical domains (English)
0 references
28 October 1999
0 references
The authors analyze a boundary version of Morera's theorem for classical domains. The starting point is Nagel and Rudin's result claiming that, if a function \(f\) is continuous on the boundary of a ball in \(\mathbb C^N\) and \[ \int_0^{2\pi}f(\psi(e^{i\varphi}, 0\dots, 0)) e^{i\varphi} d\varphi = 0 \] for all (holomorphic) automorphisms \(\psi\) of the ball, then \(f\) can be extended holomorphically onto the ball. In the article under review, the authors generalize the above assertion to the case of classical domains, replacing the boundary of the domain with its Shilov boundary (the skeleton). The proof is based on ideas different from those of \textit{A. Nagel} and \textit{W.~Rudin} [Duke. Math. J. 43, No. 4, 841-865 (1976; Zbl 0343.32017)] and enables us to prove Nagel and Rudin's theorem in the case of a ball.
0 references
holomorphic extension
0 references
boundary Morera theorem
0 references
Shilov boundary
0 references