Domain perturbations, Brownian motion, capacities, and ground states of Dirichlet Schrödinger operators (Q1323423): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Added link to MaRDI item.
RedirectionBot (talk | contribs)
Removed claims
Property / author
 
Property / author: Friedrich Gesztesy / rank
Normal rank
 
Property / author
 
Property / author: Zhongxin Zhao / rank
Normal rank
 

Revision as of 02:45, 21 February 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Domain perturbations, Brownian motion, capacities, and ground states of Dirichlet Schrödinger operators
scientific article

    Statements

    Domain perturbations, Brownian motion, capacities, and ground states of Dirichlet Schrödinger operators (English)
    0 references
    14 July 1994
    0 references
    Let \(\Omega \subset \mathbb{R}^ d\), \(d \in \mathbb{N}\), be open and connected and denote by \(-\Delta_ \Omega\) the Dirichlet Laplacian in \(L^ 2(\Omega)\). If \(\Lambda \subset \Omega\) is another open connected set, then monotonicity of the spectrum \(\sigma (-\Delta_ \Omega)\) of \(- \Delta_ \Omega\) with respect to \(\Omega\) yields the well known inequality \[ \inf [\sigma (-\Delta_ \Omega)] \leq \inf [\sigma (- \Delta_ \Lambda)]. \tag{*} \] We prove that if \(\inf [\sigma (-\Delta_ \Lambda)]\) is actually an eigenvalue of \(-\Delta_ \Lambda\), then the inequality (*) is strict if and only if the capacity of \(\Omega \backslash \Lambda\) is strictly positive. This result is in fact proven for Dirichlet Schrödinger operators of the type \(H_ \Omega= - \Delta_ \Omega+q\) under very general assumptions on the potential function \(q\) by purely probabilistic techniques. (It is also shown that this result does not extend to higher eigenvalues of \(H_ \Lambda\), \(H_ \Omega\) in general).
    0 references
    domain perturbations
    0 references
    Dirichlet Schrödinger operators
    0 references

    Identifiers