On the equivalence of McShane and Lebesgue integrals (Q1374565): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Added link to MaRDI item.
RedirectionBot (talk | contribs)
Removed claim: reviewed by (P1447): Item:Q228749
Property / reviewed by
 
Property / reviewed by: Milan Tvrdý / rank
Normal rank
 

Revision as of 07:47, 11 February 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
On the equivalence of McShane and Lebesgue integrals
scientific article

    Statements

    On the equivalence of McShane and Lebesgue integrals (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    10 December 1997
    0 references
    It is known that a given function \(f:[a,b]\to \mathbb R\) is Lebesgue integrable on \([a,b]\) if and only if it is McShane integrable. (For the definition of the McShane integral, which is a sum type integral related to the Henstock-Kurzweil integral [see, e.g., Definition 16.7 in \textit{P.-Y. Lee}, ``Lanzhou lectures on Henstock integration'' (1989; Zbl 0699.26004)] The author gives a new proof of this result which does not rely on measure theory. In particular, he does not make use of the Egoroff and Luzin theorems.
    0 references
    0 references
    McShane integral
    0 references
    Lebesgue integral
    0 references