Asymptotic comparison of three tests for goodness of fit (Q1072306): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Importer (talk | contribs)
Created a new Item
 
Added link to MaRDI item.
links / mardi / namelinks / mardi / name
 

Revision as of 00:14, 31 January 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Asymptotic comparison of three tests for goodness of fit
scientific article

    Statements

    Asymptotic comparison of three tests for goodness of fit (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    1985
    0 references
    The so-called Greenwood statistic, based on the sum of squares of the sample spacings, is known to be locally most powerful (LMP) among all tests based symmetrically on the sample spacings. On the other hand, the \(\chi^ 2\) criterion with the number of cells equal to the number of observations, is also known to be LMP among tests based symmetrically on the observed frequencies. While the latter compares the observed and expected frequencies holding the expected number in each cell to one, the former compares the expected and observed cell-lengths holding the observed number in each cell to one. We compare here these two test statistics with still another spacings test, \(\sum D_ i\log D_ i\), on the basis of their asymptotic relative efficiency and conclude that the Greenwood statistic is superior.
    0 references
    goodness of fit
    0 references
    chi-square test
    0 references
    asymptotic normality
    0 references
    Greenwood statistic
    0 references
    sum of squares of the sample spacings
    0 references
    locally most powerful
    0 references
    observed and expected frequencies
    0 references
    expected and observed cell-lengths
    0 references

    Identifiers