Generalized tilting theory (Q1743614): Difference between revisions
From MaRDI portal
Added link to MaRDI item. |
Set profile property. |
||
Property / MaRDI profile type | |||
Property / MaRDI profile type: MaRDI publication profile / rank | |||
Normal rank |
Revision as of 04:32, 5 March 2024
scientific article
Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
---|---|---|---|
English | Generalized tilting theory |
scientific article |
Statements
Generalized tilting theory (English)
0 references
13 April 2018
0 references
The concept of tilting module has its roots in the work \textit{I. N. Bernstein} et al. [Usp. Mat. Nauk 28, No. 2(170), 19--33 (1973; Zbl 0269.08001)] on reflection functors. Alternative, more polished, lists, still in the context of finite dimensional algebras over a field, were given shortly after by \textit{D. Happel} [Comment. Math. Helv. 62, 339--389 (1987; Zbl 0626.16008)] and by \textit{K. Bongartz} [Lect. Notes Math. 903, 26--38 (1981; Zbl 0478.16025)] and they laid the foundation of what is today called Tilting Theory. In essence, it was a generalization of Morita Theory. One of the fundamental consequences of Tilting Theory, which is the most interesting for the authors of this paper, is that it was the precursor of the so-called Morita theory for derived categories. Given small \(dg\)-categories \(\mathbf{A}\) and \(\mathbf{B}\), and a \(\mathbf{B}\)-\(\mathbf{A}\)-bimodule \(\mathbf{T}\), the authors present necessary and sufficient conditions for the associated derived functors of \(\text{Hom}\) and the tensor product to be fully faithful. Special emphasis is put on the case when the derived functor \(\text{RHom}_{\mathbf A}(\mathbf{T},-)\) is fully faithful and preserves compact objects, in which case nice recollements situations appear. It is also shown that, given an algebraic compactly generated triangulated category \(\mathbf{D}\), all compactly generated co-smashing triangulated subcategories which contain the compact objects appear as the image of such a \(\text{RHom}_{\mathbf A}(\mathbf{T},-)\). The results are then applied to the case when \(\mathbf{A}\) and \(\mathbf{B}\) are ordinary algebras, comparing the situation with the well-stablished tilting theory of modules. Those results, when applied to ordinary algebras, show the relationship of the appearing bimodules with the concept of good tilting module and, more generally, with tilting theory. In this way, recent results by \textit{S. Bazzoni} et al. [Proc. Am. Math. Soc. 139, No. 12, 4225--4234 (2011; Zbl 1232.16004)], \textit{H. Chen} and \textit{C. Xi} [Proc. Lond. Math. Soc. (3) 104, No. 5, 959--996 (2012; Zbl 1255.18013)] and \textit{D. Yang} [Proc. Am. Math. Soc. 140, No. 1, 83--91 (2012; Zbl 1244.18013)] have been recovered and extended.
0 references
triangulated category
0 references
\(dg\)-category
0 references
triangulated functor
0 references
tilting module
0 references
derived functor
0 references
recollement
0 references