Translation averages of dyadic weights are not always good weights. (Q1809939): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Added link to MaRDI item.
RedirectionBot (talk | contribs)
Property / reviewed by
 
Property / reviewed by: Joan L. Cerda / rank
Normal rank
 

Revision as of 05:13, 22 February 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Translation averages of dyadic weights are not always good weights.
scientific article

    Statements

    Translation averages of dyadic weights are not always good weights. (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    22 March 2004
    0 references
    The translation average \(\varphi(x)=\int_0^1 \varphi_t(x+t)\, dx\) of a collection \(\varphi_t\) of functions tends to improve certain properties of these functions, and it is known that translation averaging of dyadic BMO functions produces true BMO functions. In this paper it is proved that this is not the case for a number of dyadic properties; an appropriate construction, similar for the three cases, is used to show that improvement fails for dyadic doubling measures, for dyadic reverse Hölder weights, and for dyadic Muckenhoupt weights.
    0 references
    doubling measures
    0 references
    dyadic reverse Hölder weights
    0 references
    dyadic \(A_p\) weights
    0 references
    dyadic Muckenhoupt weights
    0 references

    Identifiers