A parabolic system modeling microbial competition in an unmixed bio-reactor (Q1924448): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Added link to MaRDI item.
RedirectionBot (talk | contribs)
Removed claims
Property / author
 
Property / author: Dung Le / rank
Normal rank
 
Property / author
 
Property / author: Hal Leslie Smith / rank
Normal rank
 
Property / reviewed by
 
Property / reviewed by: Bruno Scarpellini / rank
Normal rank
 

Revision as of 11:56, 15 February 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
A parabolic system modeling microbial competition in an unmixed bio-reactor
scientific article

    Statements

    A parabolic system modeling microbial competition in an unmixed bio-reactor (English)
    0 references
    10 July 1997
    0 references
    The authors consider a system of reaction diffusion equations of the following type: \[ S_t=d_0\Delta S-\sum^m_1\gamma^{-1}_iu_if_i(S),\quad x\in\Omega,\quad t>0,\tag{1} \] \[ (u_i)_t=d_i\Delta u_i+u_i(f_i(S)-k_i)\quad\text{for }i=1,\dots,m. \] There are inhomogeneous boundary conditions: \[ \partial_nS(t,x)+r_0(x)S(t,x)=S^0(x),\quad\partial_nu_i(t,x)=0,\quad x\in\partial\Omega,\quad t>0.\tag{2} \] Here \(\Omega\subseteq \mathbb{R}^N\) is a bounded smooth domain and \(\partial_nS(t,x)\) the derivative at \(x\in\partial\Omega\) with respect to the outer unit normal \(n(x)\) at \(x\in\partial\Omega\). Finally, nonnegative initial conditions are given: (3) \(S(0,x)=S_0(x)\), \(u_i(0,x)=u_{i0}(x)\), \(x\in\Omega\). The functions \(r_i(x)\), \(f_i(S)\), \(f(S)\), \(S^0(x)\) are subject to positivity and smoothness conditions; the numbers \(d_i\), \(\gamma_i\), \(k_i\) are positive. As to \(f\) in particular it is assumed that \(f: \mathbb{R}_+\to \mathbb{R}_+\), \(f(0)=0\) and \(f\in C^1(\mathbb{R}_+)\). Examples of particular importance are \(f(S)=mS(a+S)^{-1}\) (the Monod function) and \(f(S)=mS(a+S+K^{-1}S^2)^{-1}\) (non-monotone Andrews function). At some places it is assumed that \(f'(S)>0\) on some interval \([0,L]\) for suitable \(L\). The system (1), (2), (3) has its roots in population dynamics. The \(u_i\), \(i=1,\dots,m\) represent concentrations of competing species while \(S\) is the concentration of a nutrient. In the introduction, the authors explain at length the biological background of (1), (2), (3). Then they consider (1), (2), (3) as a semidynamical system on \(X_+=C^{m+1}_+\), where \(C_+\) is the cone of nonnegative functions in \(C(\overline\Omega)\), and where \(X=C(\overline\Omega)^{m+1}\) is endowed with the usual supremum norm. About this dynamical system, they prove a series of results. A principal one is the following Theorem: Equations (1), (2), (3) generate a semidynamical system \(T(t)\), \(t\geq 0\) on \(X_+\) which is dissipative and possesses a global attractor \(A\) having finite Hausdorff dimension; if \((S,u_1,\dots,u_m)\in A\) then \(0\leq S\leq S_*\). Here, \(S_*\) is the solution of the boundary value problem: \(\Delta S_*=0\), \(x\in\Omega\), \(\partial_nS_*+r_0(x) S_*=S^0(x)\), \(x\in\partial\Omega\). The proof requires quite a series of preparatory estimates, too involved to be discussed here. The proof provides actually more information than stated in the theorem and gives rise to further results. The paper concludes with a discussion of equilibria of (1), (2) and of their properties.
    0 references
    Monod function
    0 references
    Andrews function
    0 references
    semidynamical system
    0 references
    global attractor
    0 references
    Hausdorff dimension
    0 references

    Identifiers

    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references