A note on utility-based pricing in models with transaction costs (Q2351403): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Added link to MaRDI item.
RedirectionBot (talk | contribs)
Removed claim: reviewed by (P1447): Item:Q589933
Property / reviewed by
 
Property / reviewed by: Aleksandr D. Borisenko / rank
Normal rank
 

Revision as of 17:00, 19 February 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
A note on utility-based pricing in models with transaction costs
scientific article

    Statements

    A note on utility-based pricing in models with transaction costs (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    23 June 2015
    0 references
    The authors study the utility-based and indifference pricing in a market with transaction costs. For an initial capital \(x\in\mathbb R^{d}\), a strategy \(L\) which is a right continuous non-decreasing process, and a continuous semimartingale \(S^{i}\), let us define the portfolio holding \(X=X^{x,L}\in\mathbb R^{d}_{+}\) using the following dynamics: \[ X^{i}_{t}=x^{i}+\hat X^{i}_{-}\cdot S_{t}^{i}+\sum_{j=1}^{d}(L_{t}^{ji}-(1+\lambda^{ij})L^{ij}_{t})\quad i,j=1,\dots,d, \] where \(\hat X^{i}=X^{i}/S^{i}\); \(\hat X^{i}_{-}\cdot S_{t}^{i}\) is the stochastic integral of \(\hat X^{i}_{-}\) with respect to \(S_{t}^{i}\); \(L^{ij}_{t}\) is the cumulative net amount of funds transferred from asset \(i\) to asset \(j\) up to date \(t\) with \(L_{0-}=0\), and the matrix \((\lambda^{ij})\in M^{d}\) (\(M^{d}\) is the set of square matrices with \(d\)-lines and non-negative entries), represents the constant proportional costs with zero diagonal and satisfies \((1+\lambda^{ij})\leq(1+\lambda^{ik})(1+\lambda^{kj})\) \(\forall i,j,k\in \{1,\dots,d\}\). Let an economy specify on investor's preferences, which are described by the utility function \(U=\{U_{i}(x)=-e^{-\gamma_{i}x}, i=1,\dots,n\}\). Each investor's wealth is defined by his portfolio holding \(X^{x,L}\) and contingent claim \(B\) through the liquidation function. An allocation \(q^{*}=\{q_{i}^{*}, i=1,\dots,n\}\) and a price \(p\) of the contingent claim \(B\) constitutes a price equilibrium if an assignment exists such that \(\sum_{i=1}^{n}q^{*}_{i}=0\), for any investor with utility function \(U_{i}\), when the investor holds \(q^{*}_{i}\) units of the contingent claim, \((p,q_{i}^{*})\) is preferred to all other allocations \((p,q_{i}')\). Under the assumption that initial endowments are common for all investors, it is proved that the equilibrium is zero trade in the market with transaction costs in the utility indifference framework and in the utility-based framework.
    0 references
    market with transaction costs
    0 references
    market equilibrium of contingent claims
    0 references
    exponential utility
    0 references
    utility-based pricing
    0 references
    indifference pricing
    0 references

    Identifiers