Two simple sets that are not positively Borel (Q2488272): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Added link to MaRDI item.
RedirectionBot (talk | contribs)
Removed claim: reviewed by (P1447): Item:Q589209
Property / reviewed by
 
Property / reviewed by: Q1064321 / rank
Normal rank
 

Revision as of 11:51, 16 February 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Two simple sets that are not positively Borel
scientific article

    Statements

    Two simple sets that are not positively Borel (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    25 August 2005
    0 references
    This paper is concerned with the study of intuitionistic descriptive set theory, whose results and methods differ essentially from those of its classical counterpart. In classical descriptive set theory, one may prove, using the principle of \(\Sigma^1_1\)-Determinacy, that every (co-)analytic set that is not Borel is a complete element of the class of (co-)analytic sets. The paper's aim is to show that in intuitionistic descriptive set theory there exist, firstly, an analytic subset of Baire space \(\mathcal{N}\) that is not positively Borel and not a complete element of the class of analytic subsets of \(\mathcal{N}\) and, secondly, a co-analytic subset of \(\mathcal{N}\) that is not positively Borel and not a complete element of the class of co-analytic subsets of \(\mathcal{N}.\) The arguments make use of Brouwer's Continuity Principle (the principle of weak or local continuity for numbers).
    0 references
    intuitionistic mathematics
    0 references
    descriptive set theory
    0 references
    Borel Hierarchy Theorem
    0 references

    Identifiers