Comparison of two equivariant \(\eta\)-forms (Q2671902): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Added link to MaRDI item.
Import240304020342 (talk | contribs)
Set profile property.
Property / MaRDI profile type
 
Property / MaRDI profile type: MaRDI publication profile / rank
 
Normal rank

Revision as of 09:03, 5 March 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Comparison of two equivariant \(\eta\)-forms
scientific article

    Statements

    Comparison of two equivariant \(\eta\)-forms (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    3 June 2022
    0 references
    The fixed-point formula has two equivariant versions, the Lefschetz fixed-point formula and Kirillov-like formula of Berline-Vergne, the same is true for equivariant eta-forms. In this nice paper, authors use the analytic techniques of Bismut-Goette to define the equivariant infinitesimal Bismut-Cheeger eta-form and prove a general comparison formula between the equivariant infinitesimal Bismut-Cheeger eta-form and the equivariant Bismut-Cheeger eta-form which extend the work of Goette. In particular, they express the singularity of the equivariant eta forms modulo exact forms, at any \(g\in G\) as a locally computable differential form.
    0 references
    0 references
    equivariant \(\eta\)-form
    0 references
    equivariant infinitesimal \(\eta\)-form
    0 references
    Kirillov formula
    0 references
    index theorem
    0 references

    Identifiers