Some best possible bounds concerning the traces of finite sets (Q1340130): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
RedirectionBot (talk | contribs)
Changed an Item
Import240304020342 (talk | contribs)
Set profile property.
Property / MaRDI profile type
 
Property / MaRDI profile type: MaRDI publication profile / rank
 
Normal rank

Revision as of 03:00, 5 March 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Some best possible bounds concerning the traces of finite sets
scientific article

    Statements

    Some best possible bounds concerning the traces of finite sets (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    11 July 1995
    0 references
    Let \(X\) be an \(n\)-element set and \(\mathcal F\) a system of subsets of \(X\). For a subset \(Y\subset X\) let \({\mathcal F}_ Y\) be the trace of \(\mathcal F\) on \(Y\) (that is, \({\mathcal F}_ Y= \{F\cap Y: F\in {\mathcal F}\})\). Finally for integers \(m\), \(n\), \(r\), \(s\) the arrow relation \((m,n)\to (r,s)\) means that whenever \(|{\mathcal F}|\geq m\), one can find an \(s\)-element subset \(Y\subset X\) such that \(|{\mathcal F}_ Y|\geq r\). For example, the celebrated Vapnik-Červonenkis theorem and the Sauer theorem state that \[ (m,n)\to (2^ s, s)\quad\text{whenever}\quad m> \sum_{0\leq i< s}{n\choose i}. \] This paper studies the \((m,n)\to (m- t,n-1)\) type arrow relations, gives new proofs for the cases \(t= 4,5,6\) using a weight function technique, and derives a new result stating \((m,n)\to (m-9,n- 1)\) for \(m\leq \lceil 65n/14\rceil\).
    0 references
    bounds
    0 references
    traces of finite sets
    0 references
    arrow relation
    0 references
    Vapnik-Červonenkis theorem
    0 references
    Sauer theorem
    0 references
    weight function
    0 references

    Identifiers