A note involving \(p\)-valently Bazilević functions (Q2570928): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
RedirectionBot (talk | contribs)
Removed claims
RedirectionBot (talk | contribs)
Changed an Item
Property / author
 
Property / author: Hüseyin Irmak / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / reviewed by
 
Property / reviewed by: James A. Hummel / rank
 
Normal rank

Revision as of 10:12, 15 February 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
A note involving \(p\)-valently Bazilević functions
scientific article

    Statements

    A note involving \(p\)-valently Bazilević functions (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    31 October 2005
    0 references
    This paper proves a rather complex looking condition to obtain a similarly complex conclusion. However, this reviewer believes that there must be a defect in the theorem. The authors consider a class \(A_n(p)\) of functions of the form \(f(z) = z^p + \sum_{k=n+p}^\infty a_k z^k\) which are analytic and \(p\)-valent in the unit disc. Their main theorem states that if \(f \in A_n(p)\), \(\beta \geq 0\), \(0 \leq \alpha < p\), \(w\) is a non-zero complex number, and \(g(z)\) is a \(p\)-valent starlike function in \(A_n(p)\) and if given conditions are satisfied, then \(| [(zf'(z)/[f(z)] ^{1 - \beta}[g(z)]^\beta) - p]^w| < p-\alpha\). Unfortunately, none of the conditions in the theorem involve \(\alpha\), so the quantity \(p - \alpha\) can be arbitrarily close to zero. Since the proof of the theorem seems to be correct, it appears to the reviewer that the conditions (2.2) and (2.3) of the theorem can never be satisfied unless \([f(z)]^{1 - \beta}[g(z)]^\beta) = f(z) = z^p\).
    0 references
    \(p\)-valent functions
    0 references

    Identifiers