A constructive valuation semantics for classical logic (Q1355127): Difference between revisions
From MaRDI portal
Removed claim: reviewed by (P1447): Item:Q454365 |
Changed an Item |
||
| Property / reviewed by | |||
| Property / reviewed by: Grigori Mints / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Revision as of 11:34, 15 February 2024
scientific article
| Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
|---|---|---|---|
| English | A constructive valuation semantics for classical logic |
scientific article |
Statements
A constructive valuation semantics for classical logic (English)
0 references
12 March 1998
0 references
The goal is to find a witness for \(x\) from a classical proof of \(\exists xP(x)\) from Horn assumptions \(\forall y(Q_1(Y)\&\cdots\& Q_n(y)\to Q_{n+1}(y))\). For this fragment classical and intuitionistic provability coincide, and it is difficult to invent a classical proof which is not already intuitionistic (if obvious redundancies are deleted).
0 references
fragment of classical logic
0 references
classical provability
0 references
intuitionistic provability
0 references
