Two random constructions inside lacunary sets (Q1807906): Difference between revisions
From MaRDI portal
Changed an Item |
Set profile property. |
||
| Property / MaRDI profile type | |||
| Property / MaRDI profile type: Publication / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Revision as of 05:45, 5 March 2024
scientific article
| Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
|---|---|---|---|
| English | Two random constructions inside lacunary sets |
scientific article |
Statements
Two random constructions inside lacunary sets (English)
0 references
24 November 1999
0 references
The main result says that every polynomial sequence of integers or the sequence of primes contain a subsequence \(E\) that is a \(\Lambda (p)\)-set for all \(p<\infty\) but not a Rosenthal set (i.e., not all \(L^\infty\)-functions with spectrum in \(E\) are continuous). The proof is done by random choice.
0 references
\(\Lambda (p)\)-set
0 references
Rosenthal set
0 references
equidistributed set of integers
0 references
uniformly distributed set of integers
0 references
