Legality concepts for three-valued logic programs (Q689286): Difference between revisions
From MaRDI portal
Removed claims |
Changed an Item |
||
Property / author | |||
Property / author: Giuliano Pacini / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / reviewed by | |||
Property / reviewed by: Siegfried Johannes Gottwald / rank | |||
Normal rank |
Revision as of 19:24, 19 February 2024
scientific article
Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
---|---|---|---|
English | Legality concepts for three-valued logic programs |
scientific article |
Statements
Legality concepts for three-valued logic programs (English)
0 references
20 December 1993
0 references
The authors consider three-valued propositional logic and interpret the third truth degree (besides 0 and 1) as ``illegal'' or ``unacceptable''. With reference to a background in computer science they get (unusual) truth tables for an implication and -- noncommutative (!) -- conjunction and disjunction connectives. And they add a ``legality'' connective indicating that some formula has a ``legal'' truth degree, i.e. one of the degrees 0,1. For this logic they study Horn clauses and logic programs, introduce Herbrand models and fixpoint semantics. For the class of ``legal'' three- valued logic programs the use of the SLD resolution algorithm is proven to be sound, and it is shown that this algorithm too can be used for a legality check.
0 references
logic programming
0 references
three-valued logic
0 references
resolution
0 references