Every countable poset is embeddable in the poset of unsolvable terms (Q1098834): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
RedirectionBot (talk | contribs)
Changed an Item
Import240304020342 (talk | contribs)
Set profile property.
Property / MaRDI profile type
 
Property / MaRDI profile type: MaRDI publication profile / rank
 
Normal rank

Revision as of 02:10, 5 March 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Every countable poset is embeddable in the poset of unsolvable terms
scientific article

    Statements

    Every countable poset is embeddable in the poset of unsolvable terms (English)
    0 references
    1986
    0 references
    A combinator (or closed \(\lambda\)-term) M is solvable if for any combinator N there exists a sequence of combinators \(M_ 1,...,M_ k\) such that \(MM_ 1,...,M_ k=_{\beta}N\) (M is solvable iff M has head normal form.) Most models of \(\lambda\)-calculus do not distinguish between unsolvable combinators. The author uses the structure of the quotient poset to shed some light on their computational behaviour. For combinators M and N, M is said to be more solvable than N (N\(\leq M)\) if there exist combinators \(N_ 1,...,N_ n\) such that \(MN_ 1,...,N_ n=_{\beta}N\). \(\leq\) is a quasiordering of combinators and yields a quotient poset \({\mathcal U}\). \({\mathcal U}\) has a bottom element consisting of all solvable terms and some maximal elements, however its structure is complex. The main result of the paper shows that every countable poset can be isomorphically embedded in \({\mathcal U}\).
    0 references
    closed \(\lambda \)-term
    0 references
    models of \(\lambda \)-calculus
    0 references
    unsolvable combinators
    0 references
    quotient poset
    0 references
    computational behaviour
    0 references
    solvable terms
    0 references
    countable poset
    0 references
    0 references

    Identifiers