Zeta measures and thermodynamic formalism for temperature zero (Q711434): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
RedirectionBot (talk | contribs)
Removed claim: author (P16): Item:Q1118228
RedirectionBot (talk | contribs)
Changed an Item
Property / author
 
Property / author: Artur Oscar Lopes / rank
 
Normal rank

Revision as of 09:00, 22 February 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Zeta measures and thermodynamic formalism for temperature zero
scientific article

    Statements

    Zeta measures and thermodynamic formalism for temperature zero (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    26 October 2010
    0 references
    Let \(X= \{1,\dots,d\}^\mathbb{N}\) denote the Bernoulli space with \(d\) symbols. This is a compact metric space with metric \( d(x,y) = d_\theta(x,y)=\theta^N\) where \(N\) is given by \(x_i=y_i\) (\(i < N\)) and \(x_N \neq y_N\) for the sequences \(x=(x_i)_{i \in \mathbb{N}}\) and \(y=(y_i)_{i \in \mathbb{N}}\). Consider the Borel \(\sigma\)-algebra over \(X\) and \(\mathcal{M}\) the set of probability measures on it which are invariant under the shift map \(\sigma\). \(F_\theta\) denotes the set of real Lipschitz functions over \(X\). For strictly positive \(f \in F_\theta\) denote furthermore \[ \beta(f) = \sup_{\nu \in \mathcal{M}} \int f \, d\nu \quad \text{and} \quad M_{\max} (f) = \bigg\{ \nu \in \mathcal{M};\;\int f \, d\nu = \beta(f)\bigg\}. \] For real continuous functions \(k:X \to \mathbb{R}\) define the notation \[ k^n(x) := k(x) + k\big( \sigma(x)\big) + k\big( \sigma^2(x)\big) + \dots + k\big( \sigma^{n-1}(x)\big). \] \(\text{Fix}_n= \{x\); \(\sigma^n(x)=x\}\) denotes the set of \(n\)-periodic points and \(P(f)\) denotes the pressure for \(f\). The main object of the paper are probability measures \(\mu_{c,s} \in \mathcal{M}\) which satisfy for any continuous function \(k : x \to \mathbb{R}\) \[ \int k \, d \mu_{c,s} = \frac{\sum_{n\in \mathbb{N}} \sum_{x \in \text{Fix}_n} e^{cs f^n(x) - n P(cf) \frac{k^n(x)}{n}} }{\sum_{n\in \mathbb{N}} \sum_{x \in \text{Fix}_n} e^{cs f^n(x) - n P(cf)} }, \] where \(c >0\) and \(0 < s <1\). Define the function \(I(x)\) on periodic \(x\) for a strictly positive Lip\-schitz function \(f\) by \[ I(x) = n_x \left( \beta(f) - \frac{f^{n_x}(x)}{n_x} \right), \] where \(n_x\) denotes the minimum period of \(x\). The authors show \(\inf_{x \text{ periodic}} I(x) = 0\) and the following Theorem. Suppose \(f > 0\) is Lipschitz. When \(c \to \infty\) and \(s \to 1\), any accumulation point of \(\mu_{c,s}\) is in \(M_{\max}(f)\). Moreover, if \(g : X \to \mathbb{R}\) is a continuous function, \(c_j \to \infty\) and \(s_j \to 1\) are such that there exists \(\lim_{j \to \infty} \mu_{c_j,s_j}(g)\), then this limit is \(\int g \, d\mu\) for some accumulation point \(\mu\) of \(\mu_{c,s}\) in the weak star topology. The main result of the paper under review is the following large deviation principle for \(\mu_{c,s}\). Theorem. Suppose \(f >0\) is Lipschitz. Then, for any fixed \(0< L \leq \infty\), and for all cylinders \(k \subset X\) \[ \lim_{c(1,s) \to L} \frac{1}{c} \log \big( \mu_{c,s}(k) \big) = - \inf_{x \in k, x \text{ periodic}} I(x). \] The same is true if we have \(\liminf_{c \to \infty, s \to 1} c(1-s) = L\). It is also shown that the requirement of periodic \(x\) can be dropped in the previous large deviation principle.
    0 references
    zeta measure
    0 references
    maximizing probability
    0 references
    large deviation principle
    0 references
    Gibbs measure
    0 references

    Identifiers

    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references