Condensed detachment is complete for relevance logic: A computer-aided proof (Q1181717): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Import240304020342 (talk | contribs)
Set profile property.
ReferenceBot (talk | contribs)
Changed an Item
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: The semantics and proof theory of linear logic / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Combinatory logic. With two sections by William Craig. / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Completeness of the normal typed fragment of the \(\lambda\)-system \(U\) / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: The Principal Type-Scheme of an Object in Combinatory Logic / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Principal type-schemes and condensed detachment / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Über Tautologien, in Welchen Keine Variable Mehr Als Zweimal Vorkommt / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: A Machine-Oriented Logic Based on the Resolution Principle / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q3348885 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Maslov's inverse method and decidable classes / rank
 
Normal rank

Revision as of 13:29, 15 May 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Condensed detachment is complete for relevance logic: A computer-aided proof
scientific article

    Statements

    Condensed detachment is complete for relevance logic: A computer-aided proof (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    27 June 1992
    0 references
    The condensed detachment rule \(D\) is a combination of modus ponens with a minimal amount of substitution. Earlier \(D\) has been shown to be complete for intuitionistic and classical implicational logic but incomplete for \(BCK\) and \(BCI\) logic. We show that \(D\) is complete for the relevance logic. One of the main steps is the proof of the formula \(((a\to a)\to a)\to a\) found in interaction with our resolution theorem prover. Various strategies of generating consequences of the axioms and choosing best ones for the next iteration were tried until the proof was found.
    0 references
    condensed detachment rule
    0 references
    relevance logic
    0 references
    0 references

    Identifiers

    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references