Sequential laminates in multiple-state optimal design problems (Q610047): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Import240304020342 (talk | contribs)
Set profile property.
ReferenceBot (talk | contribs)
Changed an Item
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Shape optimization by the homogenization method / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: On some projections of homogenised coefficients for stationary diffusion equation / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q4672108 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: deal.II—A general-purpose object-oriented finite element library / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q4449265 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q4218867 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q3996569 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Convex Analysis / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q3712658 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q4380813 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q2702322 / rank
 
Normal rank

Revision as of 12:40, 3 July 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Sequential laminates in multiple-state optimal design problems
scientific article

    Statements

    Sequential laminates in multiple-state optimal design problems (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    1 December 2010
    0 references
    Summary: In the study of optimal design related to stationary diffusion problems with multiple-state equations, the description of the set \(\mathcal H=\{(Aa_1,\cdots ,Aa_m):A \in \mathcal K(\theta)\}\) for given vectors \(a_1,\cdots ,a_m \in \mathbb R^d (m<d)\) is crucial. \(\mathcal K(\theta)\) denotes all composite materials (in the sense of homogenisation theory) with given local proportion \(\theta\) of the first material. We prove that the boundary of \(\mathcal H\) is attained by sequential laminates of rank at most \(m\) with matrix phase \(\alpha \mathbf I\) and core \(\beta \mathbf I (\alpha < \beta)\). Examples showing that the information on the rank of optimal laminate cannot be improved, as well as the fact that sequential laminates with matrix phase \(\alpha\mathbf I\) are preferred to those with matrix phase \(\beta \mathbf I\), are presented. This result can significantly reduce the complexity of optimality conditions, with obvious impact on numerical treatment, as demonstrated in a simple numerical example.
    0 references

    Identifiers