Disjoint pairs for \(\text{GL}_n (\mathbb R)\) and \(\text{GL}_n (\mathbb C)\) (Q664912): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Import240304020342 (talk | contribs)
Set profile property.
Set OpenAlex properties.
Property / full work available at URL
 
Property / full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crma.2011.11.011 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / OpenAlex ID
 
Property / OpenAlex ID: W1977927719 / rank
 
Normal rank

Revision as of 23:38, 19 March 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Disjoint pairs for \(\text{GL}_n (\mathbb R)\) and \(\text{GL}_n (\mathbb C)\)
scientific article

    Statements

    Disjoint pairs for \(\text{GL}_n (\mathbb R)\) and \(\text{GL}_n (\mathbb C)\) (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    5 March 2012
    0 references
    A family of mixed (symplectic-Whittaker) models for irreducible representations of \(\text{GL}(n)\) was introduced by \textit{A. A. Klyachko} in [Math. USSR, Sb. 48, 365--379 (1984); translation from Mat. Sb., Nov. Ser. 120(162), No. 3, 371--376 (1983; Zbl 0526.20033)]. Over a finite field and a \(p\)-adic field, the existence (for unitary representations), the uniqueness and the disjointness of these models were proved in [\textit{N. F. J. Inglis} and \textit{J. Saxl}, Arch. Math. 57, No. 5, 424--431 (1991; Zbl 0826.20038)], [\textit{O. Offen} and \textit{E. Sayag}, Int. Math. Res. Not. 2008, Article ID rnm136, 25 p. (2008; Zbl 1158.22021); J. Funct. Anal. 254, No. 11, 2846--2865 (2008; Zbl 1143.22013)]. The paper under review proves the disjointness of these models over the real field and the complex field. This has interesting implications in the theory of automorphic forms.
    0 references
    Klyachko model
    0 references
    irreducible representation
    0 references
    disjointness
    0 references
    0 references

    Identifiers