Constraint classification in mathematical programming (Q689150): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Import240304020342 (talk | contribs)
Set profile property.
ReferenceBot (talk | contribs)
Changed an Item
 
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Hit-and-run algorithms for the identification of nonredundant linear inequalities / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: A degenerate extreme point strategy for the classification of linear constraints as redundant or necessary / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: A Greedy Heuristic for the Set-Covering Problem / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Identifying Minimally Infeasible Subsystems of Inequalities / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Redundancy in mathematical programming. A state-of-the-art survey / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: OnR.W. Llewellyn's rules to identify redundant constraints: A detailed critique and some generalizations / rank
 
Normal rank

Latest revision as of 10:32, 22 May 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Constraint classification in mathematical programming
scientific article

    Statements

    Constraint classification in mathematical programming (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    9 December 1993
    0 references
    Consider a set of algebraic inequality constraints defining either an empty or a nonempty feasible region. It is known that each constraint can be classified as either absolutely strongly redundant, relatively strongly redundant, absolutely weakly redundant, relatively weakly redundant, or necessary. We show that it is worth making a distinction between weakly necessary constraints and strongly necessary constraints. We also present a feasible set cover method which can detect both weakly and strongly necessary constraints. The main interest in constraint classification is due to the advantages gained by the removal of redundant constraints. Since classification errors are likely to occur, we examine how the removal of a single constraint can affect the classification of the remaining constraints.
    0 references
    algebraic inequality constraints
    0 references
    feasible set cover method
    0 references
    weakly and strongly necessary constraints
    0 references
    constraint classification
    0 references
    removal of redundant constraints
    0 references
    hit-and-run
    0 references

    Identifiers