When do the transpose and dual agree? (Q762255): Difference between revisions
From MaRDI portal
Set profile property. |
Set OpenAlex properties. |
||
Property / full work available at URL | |||
Property / full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/0024-3795(84)90114-9 / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / OpenAlex ID | |||
Property / OpenAlex ID: W1975162295 / rank | |||
Normal rank |
Revision as of 22:31, 19 March 2024
scientific article
Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
---|---|---|---|
English | When do the transpose and dual agree? |
scientific article |
Statements
When do the transpose and dual agree? (English)
0 references
1984
0 references
Let R be an Artin-algebra, K its center and \({}_ KC\) an injective cogenerator. In the paper those indecomposable algebras R are determined for which \(M^*=Hom(M,R)\), resp. \(D(M)=Hom_ K(M,C)\) coincides with the Auslander-Bridger transpose tr M for all finitely generated R-modules M without projective direct summands. These are the Nakayama-algebras with one simple module in case D(M)\(\cong tr M\) and the self-injective Nakayama-algebras with c(R)\(\equiv 0 (n)\) in case \(M^*\cong tr M\), where c(R) is the (common) composition length of the indecomposable projective R-modules and n the number of simple modules.
0 references
Artin-algebra
0 references
center
0 references
injective cogenerator
0 references
indecomposable algebras
0 references
Auslander-Bridger transpose
0 references
Nakayama-algebras
0 references
self-injective Nakayama- algebras
0 references
composition length
0 references
number of simple modules
0 references