When do the transpose and dual agree? (Q762255): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Import240304020342 (talk | contribs)
Set profile property.
Set OpenAlex properties.
Property / full work available at URL
 
Property / full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/0024-3795(84)90114-9 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / OpenAlex ID
 
Property / OpenAlex ID: W1975162295 / rank
 
Normal rank

Revision as of 22:31, 19 March 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
When do the transpose and dual agree?
scientific article

    Statements

    When do the transpose and dual agree? (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    1984
    0 references
    Let R be an Artin-algebra, K its center and \({}_ KC\) an injective cogenerator. In the paper those indecomposable algebras R are determined for which \(M^*=Hom(M,R)\), resp. \(D(M)=Hom_ K(M,C)\) coincides with the Auslander-Bridger transpose tr M for all finitely generated R-modules M without projective direct summands. These are the Nakayama-algebras with one simple module in case D(M)\(\cong tr M\) and the self-injective Nakayama-algebras with c(R)\(\equiv 0 (n)\) in case \(M^*\cong tr M\), where c(R) is the (common) composition length of the indecomposable projective R-modules and n the number of simple modules.
    0 references
    Artin-algebra
    0 references
    center
    0 references
    injective cogenerator
    0 references
    indecomposable algebras
    0 references
    Auslander-Bridger transpose
    0 references
    Nakayama-algebras
    0 references
    self-injective Nakayama- algebras
    0 references
    composition length
    0 references
    number of simple modules
    0 references

    Identifiers