An inequality relating the regulator and the discriminant of a number field (Q800969): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Import240304020342 (talk | contribs)
Set profile property.
ReferenceBot (talk | contribs)
Changed an Item
 
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q3342674 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: On a question of Lehmer and the number of irreducible factors of a polynomial / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q3309989 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Regulatorabschätzungen für total reelle algebraische Zahlkörper / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q5813236 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q3658109 / rank
 
Normal rank

Latest revision as of 15:06, 14 June 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
An inequality relating the regulator and the discriminant of a number field
scientific article

    Statements

    An inequality relating the regulator and the discriminant of a number field (English)
    0 references
    1984
    0 references
    Let K be a number field of degree d with regulator R and absolute discriminant D. Let \(r=r(K)\) be the rank of the unit group in K, and let \(\rho\) be the maximum of r(k) as k ranges over proper subfields of K. It is proved that \(R>c_ d (\log (\gamma_ dD))^{r-\rho}\) for positive constants \(c_ d,\gamma_ d\) depending only on d. The proof is simple but interesting. The author makes the plausible conjecture that the exponent r-\(\rho\) is best possible. There are a few annoying misprints. E.g., in the definition of \(\alpha\) (j) on p. 440 inequality should be replaced by equality.
    0 references
    0 references
    regulator
    0 references
    discriminant
    0 references
    inequality
    0 references

    Identifiers