An inequality relating the regulator and the discriminant of a number field (Q800969): Difference between revisions
From MaRDI portal
Set profile property. |
ReferenceBot (talk | contribs) Changed an Item |
||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: Q3342674 / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: On a question of Lehmer and the number of irreducible factors of a polynomial / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: Q3309989 / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: Regulatorabschätzungen für total reelle algebraische Zahlkörper / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: Q5813236 / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: Q3658109 / rank | |||
Normal rank |
Latest revision as of 15:06, 14 June 2024
scientific article
Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
---|---|---|---|
English | An inequality relating the regulator and the discriminant of a number field |
scientific article |
Statements
An inequality relating the regulator and the discriminant of a number field (English)
0 references
1984
0 references
Let K be a number field of degree d with regulator R and absolute discriminant D. Let \(r=r(K)\) be the rank of the unit group in K, and let \(\rho\) be the maximum of r(k) as k ranges over proper subfields of K. It is proved that \(R>c_ d (\log (\gamma_ dD))^{r-\rho}\) for positive constants \(c_ d,\gamma_ d\) depending only on d. The proof is simple but interesting. The author makes the plausible conjecture that the exponent r-\(\rho\) is best possible. There are a few annoying misprints. E.g., in the definition of \(\alpha\) (j) on p. 440 inequality should be replaced by equality.
0 references
regulator
0 references
discriminant
0 references
inequality
0 references