Why mathematical morphology needs complete lattices (Q811477): Difference between revisions
From MaRDI portal
Set profile property. |
Set OpenAlex properties. |
||
Property / full work available at URL | |||
Property / full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-1684(90)90046-2 / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / OpenAlex ID | |||
Property / OpenAlex ID: W1963848754 / rank | |||
Normal rank |
Latest revision as of 22:04, 19 March 2024
scientific article
Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
---|---|---|---|
English | Why mathematical morphology needs complete lattices |
scientific article |
Statements
Why mathematical morphology needs complete lattices (English)
0 references
1990
0 references
If \(L\) is a complete lattice, then \(d: L\to L\) is a dilatation (erosion) operator, if for any \(S\subseteq L\) \[ d(\sup S)=\sup_{X\in S}d(X)\qquad (d(\inf S)=\inf_{X\in S}d(X)). \] This is a generalization of the case that \(L\) is a power set of \(\mathbb Z^ d\). It is shown, that this generalization is necessary for a mathematically coherent application of morphological operators to grey-level images.
0 references
complete lattice
0 references
dilatation (erosion)
0 references
grey-level images
0 references