A horror story about integration methods (Q5896541): Difference between revisions
From MaRDI portal
Set profile property. |
ReferenceBot (talk | contribs) Changed an Item |
||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: Q5516156 / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: Q4070368 / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: Regular and stochastic motion / rank | |||
Normal rank |
Revision as of 15:53, 21 June 2024
scientific article; zbMATH DE number 4199504
Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
---|---|---|---|
English | A horror story about integration methods |
scientific article; zbMATH DE number 4199504 |
Statements
A horror story about integration methods (English)
0 references
1991
0 references
On the basis of two simple numerical methods, i.e. the time-centered leapfrog and predictor-corrector, the author shows that numerical solutions of physical problems can give different results. One unphysical result is shown for the physical pendulum in the case when the predictor-corrector method is used for solving the problem. On the other hand it is shown that the predictor-corrector method performs well with harmonic oscillator, and the time-centered leapfrog performs well with both harmonic oscillator and physical pendulum. The examples are useful for didactic purposes, since they illustrate the need for care in matching numerical methods to problems, especially in long integrations.
0 references
time-centered leapfrog
0 references
physical pendulum
0 references
predictor-corrector method
0 references
harmonic oscillator
0 references