A horror story about integration methods (Q5896541): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Import240304020342 (talk | contribs)
Set profile property.
ReferenceBot (talk | contribs)
Changed an Item
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q5516156 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q4070368 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Regular and stochastic motion / rank
 
Normal rank

Revision as of 15:53, 21 June 2024

scientific article; zbMATH DE number 4199504
Language Label Description Also known as
English
A horror story about integration methods
scientific article; zbMATH DE number 4199504

    Statements

    A horror story about integration methods (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    1991
    0 references
    On the basis of two simple numerical methods, i.e. the time-centered leapfrog and predictor-corrector, the author shows that numerical solutions of physical problems can give different results. One unphysical result is shown for the physical pendulum in the case when the predictor-corrector method is used for solving the problem. On the other hand it is shown that the predictor-corrector method performs well with harmonic oscillator, and the time-centered leapfrog performs well with both harmonic oscillator and physical pendulum. The examples are useful for didactic purposes, since they illustrate the need for care in matching numerical methods to problems, especially in long integrations.
    0 references
    time-centered leapfrog
    0 references
    physical pendulum
    0 references
    predictor-corrector method
    0 references
    harmonic oscillator
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references

    Identifiers

    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references