Lower bounds for coverings of pairs by large blocks (Q910408): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Import240304020342 (talk | contribs)
Set profile property.
ReferenceBot (talk | contribs)
Changed an Item
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: On coverings / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q5522938 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q3889076 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q3340874 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q3698806 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: On a packing and covering problem / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q5734432 / rank
 
Normal rank

Revision as of 13:52, 20 June 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Lower bounds for coverings of pairs by large blocks
scientific article

    Statements

    Lower bounds for coverings of pairs by large blocks (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    1989
    0 references
    Let C(n,k,t) be the minimum cardinality of a class of k-tuples of X such that every t-tuple of X is contained in at least one k-tuple (n\(\geq k\geq t)\). Let \[ L(n,k,t)=\lceil \frac{n}{k}\lceil \frac{n-1}{k- 1}\lceil...\lceil \frac{n-t+1}{k-t+1}\rceil...\rceil \rceil \rceil \] where \(\lceil\). \(\rceil\) is the greatest integer function. Clearly C(n,k,t)\(\geq L(n,k,t)\). In this note it is shown that this lower bound can be improved in some cases.
    0 references
    coverings
    0 references
    projective planes
    0 references
    affine planes
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references

    Identifiers

    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references